White House calls Indiana abortion ban ‘devastating’

Published
1

WASHINGTON: The White House on Saturday assailed Indiana lawmakers for passing sweeping curbs on abortion access, calling it “devastating” step for the Midwestern state.

Indiana on Friday became the first state to pass such a law since the Supreme Court in June struck down the constitutional right to an abortion, originally affirmed in the landmark Roe v. Wade case.

“The Indiana legislature took a devastating step as a result of the Supreme Court’s extreme decision to overturn Roe v. Wade

and eliminate women’s constitutionally-protected right to abortion,” said a statement from White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre.

“It’s another radical step by Republican legislators to take away women’s reproductive rights and freedom, and put personal health care decisions in the hands of politicians rather than women and their doctors.”

Both houses of the Republican-dominated Indiana legislature passed the abortion measure on Friday after weeks of bitter debate, and Governor Eric Holcomb, a Republican, quickly signed it.

When the measure takes effect Sept 15, it will allow abortions only in cases of rape, incest, lethal fetal abnormality or when a pregnant woman faces the risk of death or severe health problems.

Alexis McGill Johnson, president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, which advocates for abortion rights, called the law “cruel” and “devastating.” Jean-Pierre, in her statement, said Congress should “act immediately to pass a law restoring the protections of Roe — the only way to secure a woman’s right to choose nationally.”

Until then, she said, “President Biden is committed to taking action to protect women’s reproductive rights and freedom.” While some conservative states earlier this year had preemptively passed “trigger” laws to immediately prohibit abortion once the Supreme Court acted, Indiana lacked such a law.

Abortion there had been legal up to 22 weeks. It was to state capital Indianapolis that a 10-year-old girl, victim of rape, had traveled for an abortion when unable to obtain one in neighboring Ohio.

That story drew intense media attention, further fueling passions around the issue.

Abortion has long been deeply divisive in the US, and the Supreme Court’s decision ensured its centrality in the political debate ahead of midterm elections.

Democrats, who say the Supreme Court is seriously out of touch with the national mood, have seized on the result of a vote on Tuesday in heavily conservative Kansas, which chose overwhelmingly to preserve that state’s constitutional protection of abortion rights.

Published in Dawn, August 7th, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

Danger ahead
Updated 08 Aug, 2026

Danger ahead

PAKISTAN has already paid a heavy human price this monsoon, even as another dangerous spell approaches. NDMA figures...
Israeli impunity
08 Aug, 2026

Israeli impunity

ANY hope that Hamas’s decision to disarm would lead to a breakthrough has been dashed for one simple reason:...
Flawed investigations
Updated 08 Aug, 2026

Flawed investigations

An inaccurate record of a victim’s wounds hinders the dispensation of justice. Medical examiners in such a critical area cannot cut corners.
Terrorist havens
07 Aug, 2026

Terrorist havens

DESPITE the use of both carrots and sticks by the international community, the Afghan Taliban refuse to cut their...
Mineral wealth
Updated 07 Aug, 2026

Mineral wealth

Any future agreements involving critical minerals must be subjected to rigorous legal, financial and technical scrutiny.
Growth denied
07 Aug, 2026

Growth denied

THE Sindh government’s agreement with the World Bank to combine health, nutrition, sanitation, social protection...