Bush to sound out Putin on democracy

Published November 19, 2005

BUSAN (South Korea): President Bush, heading into a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday, was prepared to register alarm about a new Kremlin campaign to tighten control over Russian democracy, US officials said.

The session between the leaders, on the sidelines of an Asian economic summit that opens here on Friday, was scheduled as Russia moved to shut down foreign-funded human rights groups and research organizations and to impose tight regulations on domestic non-governmental organizations.

The matter would once again put Bush and Putin at odds over the course of Russia’s fragile civil society at a time when Bush has vowed to promote freedom and democracy around the world. Putin’s campaign to consolidate power at home has frequently shadowed his meetings with Bush. At the same time, Bush has tried to preserve his friendship with Putin, cemented in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

Legislation endorsed by Putin’s cabinet and co-sponsored by his political party would bar foreign non-governmental organizations, or NGOs, from operating offices in Russia and require all 450,000 of them to reregister with the state to ensure that they do not engage in foreign-funded political activity. Putin’s government has taken over independent television, eliminated election of governors, driven pro-western parties out of parliament and prosecuted business magnates who challenged his administration.

The legislation’s sponsors in the State Duma, or lower house of parliament, characterize internationally financed NGOs as a ‘fifth column’ doing the bidding of foreigners in Russia, evidently concerned that they could provide sustenance for an opposition movement much like those that launched revolutions in neighbouring Georgia and Ukraine.

Among the foreign groups that could be shut down if the legislation is enacted are the Carnegie Moscow Centre, the most prominent research organization in Russia; Human Rights Watch, which has criticized government brutality in Chechnya; and the Ford Foundation, which finances projects intended to build a civil society and fight Aids.

“We have some pretty serious concerns about it, both the legislation itself and how it would be implemented,” a Bush administration official said on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the news media. If Bush does bring it up, the official said, the message would be that ‘there’s nothing to fear about foreign NGOs’.

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice raised the issue with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov when they met here on Wednesday, according to another US official. In his fifth meeting of the year with Putin, Bush planned to discuss it along with a variety of other issues on the US-Russian agenda, including what to do about nuclear programmes in Iran and North Korea, their shared fight against terrorism and Russia’s aspiration to join the World Trade Organization.

Bush has come under pressure at home to address the NGO matter with Putin. Two former vice presidential candidates, Republican Jack Kemp and Democrat John Edwards, sent a letter to the president calling the Kremlin move ‘a disturbing new challenge’ to private nonprofit groups in Russia that draw support from the United States.

“The impact of this measure, if it became law, should be obvious: it would roll back pluralism in Russia and curtail contact between our societies,” wrote Kemp and Edwards, who serve as co-chairmen of a Council on Foreign Relations task force on Russia. “It would mark a complete breach of the commitment to strengthen such contact that President Putin made when you and he met in Bratislava,” the capital of Slovakia, in February.

Kemp and Edwards noted that Russia will host the Group of Eight major nations next year and said that the NGO crackdown “raises an almost unthinkable prospect — that the president of Russia might serve as chairman of the G-8 at the same time that laws come into force in his country to choke off contacts with global society”.—Dawn/The Washington Post News Service

Opinion

Editorial

GB polls’ aftermath
Updated 11 Jun, 2026

GB polls’ aftermath

The new administration must address the region’s issues proactively.
Peace in retreat
11 Jun, 2026

Peace in retreat

THE ceasefire announced in April was supposed to create space for negotiations. Instead, it has been repeatedly...
A few good men
11 Jun, 2026

A few good men

IT was a brave move, no doubt. This Tuesday, in the land of the Afghan Taliban, a few good men decided to take a...
Centre vs provinces
Updated 10 Jun, 2026

Centre vs provinces

The reason the centre finds itself in this position is rooted in its failure to expand the tax net and boost revenues.
Party in crisis
10 Jun, 2026

Party in crisis

THE young KP chief minister must be starting to realise just how thorny a seat he occupies. There has been a flurry...
Varsity woes
10 Jun, 2026

Varsity woes

FINANCIAL crises affecting public sector universities across Pakistan are now having an impact on academic...