Dire straits

Published
3
The writer completed his doctorate on a Fulbright scholarship.
The writer completed his doctorate on a Fulbright scholarship.

AS Pakistan watches the striking turn of events in neighbouring Afghanistan, almost all the attention has remained focused on political negotiations surrounding the formation of the new government. This focus is not misplaced as sustainable peace in Afghanistan has been inextricably linked with the formation of a multi-ethnic, inclusive and representative government. The immediate problem is that Afghanistan is staring down the abyss of complete economic and financial collapse. This imminent economic meltdown, if left unchecked, will lead to unrelenting social unrest pushing millions of refugees towards Pakistan.

The Afghan economic outlook was not rosy even before the US decided to jump ship. Afghanistan represented a classic case of a demand-driven, supply-constrained, highly open economy that struggled with an enormous fiscal gap and very weak government revenues. Foreign aid composed three-quarters of the budget and about 42 per cent of GDP. The drawdown of international troops over the last few years led to significant expenditure cuts by foreign countries. This reduction and the inability of the Afghan economy to attract FDI began putting brakes on the economy. The Asian Development Bank estimated that about two-thirds of Afghans live below the international poverty line of $1.90 per day. The economic situation in Afghanistan is about to get even worse.

The Afghan economy is on the verge of collapse.

Immediately after the new political order in Kabul, there were widespread bank runs, while the ATMs ran out of cash very quickly. Economists call this phenomenon a ‘liquidity trap’ when uncertainty forces people to hoard cash bringing economies to a standstill. The fact that the US and IMF have taken away Afghanistan’s access to its foreign exchange reserves means that the country now has almost no ability to import food, essential commodities or life-saving medicines. On top of all this, as capital flight takes root, a rapidly depreciating currency — the Afghani — will create a hyperinflationary situation making everything further out of the reach of common Afghans. Moreover, as foreign aid flows completely dry up, the Afghan economy will contract by about 25pc in the next two years, thereby destroying millions of jobs.

These economic dire straits will push more and more Afghans towards grinding poverty and misery. Consequently, there is going to be huge refugee exodus towards Pakistan. Reports indicate that thousands have already crossed over into Pakistan through Chaman in the immediate aftermath of the Taliban takeover.

Unfortunately, Pakistan is in no position to host another few million Afghan refugees. Despite increasing poverty incidence, Pakistani policymakers have only been able to earmark a paltry Rs168 billion rupees to BISP/Ehsaas Kifalat on account of fiscal constraints.

Lack of resources notwithstanding, an additional wave of refugees would create a number of serious social, economic and political challenges in Pakistan. For starters, given that around 25m children in Pakistan are already out of school, how is the public education system going to even cope with additional school-aged children? Also, most Afghan refugees would take up low-paying jobs in the informal economy, thereby taking away jobs from already poor Pakistani citizens. Finally, more pressure on public services, education and jobs would invariably lead to ethnic strife, especially in big cities like Karachi.

One way in which these negative impacts can be ameliorated is by ensuring that Afghan refugees only settle on the western side of the Durand Line. Pakistani state and society must do their utmost to assist Afghans in this time of need by sending teachers, doctors and nurses to these refugee settlements, while ensuring protection through a force raised by the Troika Plus countries minus the US.

All efforts to assist Afghans will remain meaningless unless the Afghan economy can be stabilised. Afghan policymakers must dissociate political government formation from economic management and assign economy experts to manage key institutions like Da Afghanistan Bank. Pakistani policymakers can assist Afghanistan by letting Afghan importers pay in their local currency for Pakistani imports, at least for essential items. Moreover, the State Bank of Pakistan could establish a bilateral swap line of about $2 billion for Afghans wanting to import essentials from the rest of the world — this would cover one-third of Afghan imports in 2020.

Despite taking away plane loads of Afghan teachers, doctors and nurses, Western nations have washed their hands of Afghanistan making it abundantly clear that they will not accept any Afghan refugees. In order to assist the people of this war-torn country, Afghan and Pakistani policymakers must work together and to quicky stabilise the Afghan economy in the immediate short term.

The writer completed his doctorate on a Fulbright scholarship.

aqdas.afzal@gmail.com

Published in Dawn, September 9th, 2021

Editorial

Blue wave
Updated 05 Nov, 2026

Blue wave

While Trump does not usually learn from his errors, perhaps seeing the response of the American voters he may attempt a wiser course.
New LPG policy
Updated 05 Nov, 2026

New LPG policy

If the policy is enforced effectively, it could potentially help end shortages and slash prices. But the question remains whether it will.
Polio’s other victims
05 Nov, 2026

Polio’s other victims

FOR decades, Pakistan has vowed to eradicate polio. Billions have been spent on logistics and awareness drives. Yet...
Electoral reform
Updated 04 Nov, 2026

Electoral reform

The real problem is the gulf between the statute book and what happens on polling day, not the laws.
Competing demands
04 Nov, 2026

Competing demands

THE climate crisis is becoming harder to confront as the world develops new ways to consume scarce resources. At an...
Belated meeting
Updated 04 Nov, 2026

Belated meeting

Whether it is Imran Khan, his family members, or other incarcerated political leaders and activists, the state should not deny them their rights.