CTD records statements of Sattar, Anis in RAW links inquiry

Published June 6, 2021
Dr Farooq Sattar (L) and Anis Ahmed Khan Advocate (R) on Saturday appeared before investigators belonging to the Counter-Terrorism Department (CTD) and recorded their statements. — PPI/Online
Dr Farooq Sattar (L) and Anis Ahmed Khan Advocate (R) on Saturday appeared before investigators belonging to the Counter-Terrorism Department (CTD) and recorded their statements. — PPI/Online

KARACHI: Senior politicians Dr Farooq Sattar and Anis Ahmed Khan Advocate on Saturday appeared before investigators belonging to the Counter-Terrorism Department (CTD) and recorded their statements denying any links with two held suspects allegedly trained by Indian intelligence agency RAW.

Dr Sattar is the head of MQM-Pakistan’s Organisation Restoration Committee (ORC) while Anis Advocate was a leader of the Pak Sarzameen Party (PSP).

“Both the leaders arrived and answered questions asked by the CTD investigators,” said DIG Omar Shahid Hamid.

He said that the CTD asked Anis Advocate to appear again as the investigators needed some documents and to ask further questions.

The CTD claimed to have arrested suspects Imran and Naeem on May 28 alleging that they were senior MQM workers and “trained by RAW’. They said that the duo told investigators that they had developed ties with RAW with the help of Dr Sattar.

A senior police officer says PSP leader Anis Advocate is asked to appear again

‘Double standard’

Talking to the media after appearing before the CTD Civil Lines, Dr Sattar said that held suspects had shown their affiliation with the MQM and given his reference, but he “rejected the links and reference the alleged suspects made about me”.

He said in the recent past a suspect had named Sindh Chief Minister Syed Murad Ali Shah, but the CM was not summoned or grilled in the light of the allegations made against him.

He said summoning him was an example of “double standard”.

Dr Sattar said that he would not talk in detail about the CTD questioning because it might adversely affect the inquiry.

He maintained that his organisation had zero tolerance for criminals. “We had remained associated with a political party for 30-35 years ... if someone met and took pictures it would be inappropriate to link us on such basis,” he said.

He made it clear that his name was not included in the FIR.

He said it had been their complaint that politicians were being implicated in criminal cases on a political basis.

“We condemned terrorism in the past and are ready and willing to cooperate for the sake of peace,” he said.

Published in Dawn, June 6th, 2021

Opinion

Editorial

Digital growth
Updated 25 Apr, 2024

Digital growth

Democratising digital development will catalyse a rapid, if not immediate, improvement in human development indicators for the underserved segments of the Pakistani citizenry.
Nikah rights
25 Apr, 2024

Nikah rights

THE Supreme Court recently delivered a judgement championing the rights of women within a marriage. The ruling...
Campus crackdowns
25 Apr, 2024

Campus crackdowns

WHILE most Western governments have either been gladly facilitating Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza, or meekly...
Ties with Tehran
Updated 24 Apr, 2024

Ties with Tehran

Tomorrow, if ties between Washington and Beijing nosedive, and the US asks Pakistan to reconsider CPEC, will we comply?
Working together
24 Apr, 2024

Working together

PAKISTAN’S democracy seems adrift, and no one understands this better than our politicians. The system has gone...
Farmers’ anxiety
24 Apr, 2024

Farmers’ anxiety

WHEAT prices in Punjab have plummeted far below the minimum support price owing to a bumper harvest, reckless...