US Syria strike

Published
7

IF the US is serious about mending fences with Iran, then firing missiles at fighters allied with Tehran in Syria may not be the best way to go about it. In President Joe Biden’s first major offensive overseas action, over 20 fighters belonging to militias loyal to Iran were killed when American missiles struck facilities in eastern Syria. While the Pentagon has termed the attack “a message”, Damascus has called it “American aggression”. The strikes came as an apparent reaction to the targeting of a base in Iraq hosting American forces on Feb 15, reportedly by pro-Iran militias. The fact is that the entire region, particularly Iraq and Syria, is a proxy battlefield where the US and its allies regularly square off against Iran and its loyalists. And while many Shia militias in Iraq take orders from Tehran, there are numerous armed factions that operate independently. Therefore, the need here is to proceed with caution, and prevent any sort of escalation, with both sides required to exhibit restraint.

It is entirely possible that the Biden administration has flexed its muscles through the missile strike, letting Iran know that while it is ready to talk, it still has offensive options on the table. Iran, meanwhile, has called upon Washington to lift sanctions before it returns to its commitments under the nuclear deal, which Mr Biden’s predecessor unilaterally pulled the US out of. The Islamic Republic has been scaling back on its commitments ever since the Trump administration started intensifying its ‘maximum pressure’ campaign on Iran. Therefore, at this point there is both great opportunity and great peril for the region. The opportunity lies in the fact that the new incumbent of the White House is using a less confrontational tone with Iran, and if both sides reach a halfway point progress can be made in returning to the deal and improving relations. However, peril lies in the fact that if the US chooses to talk through its considerable firepower, as it did in eastern Syria, and Iran opts to respond in a similar tone, the confrontation will worsen. The US can send a more positive signal to Iran by letting it know that sanctions relief will be guaranteed if it returns to its commitments, while the Iranian leadership should also lower the temperature and talk to the Americans, for the sake of its struggling economy.

Published in Dawn, March 1st, 2021

Opinion

Editorial

Iran status quo
Updated 12 Nov, 2026

Iran status quo

The US cannot hold the world hostage in order to find an honourable exit from a disastrous war for which it has only itself — and Israel — to blame.
Unspent funds
12 Nov, 2026

Unspent funds

THE slow pace of development spending shows how public investment continues to bear the brunt of efforts to create a...
Homes and hope
12 Nov, 2026

Homes and hope

THE completion of more than one million homes for families displaced by the 2022 floods is a moment worth...
Opposition moves
Updated 11 Nov, 2026

Opposition moves

Expectations of the maulana leading another street confrontation with the government anytime soon are likely to remain wishful thinking.
CT battle
Updated 11 Nov, 2026

CT battle

Gains made over the last month should be capitalised on, with the affected areas permanently cleared of terrorists.
Water management
11 Nov, 2026

Water management

THE Sindh chief minister, while reflecting on Karachi’s water woes, recently observed that water supply is only part...