US invites Iran to Afghan peace talks

Published September 29, 2020
The United States has invited Iran to join the Afghan peace talks and is also willing to invest in infrastructure projects linking Central Asia to Pakistan, says Zalmay Khalilzad. — AP/File
The United States has invited Iran to join the Afghan peace talks and is also willing to invest in infrastructure projects linking Central Asia to Pakistan, says Zalmay Khalilzad. — AP/File

WASHINGTON: The United States has invited Iran to join the Afghan peace talks and is also willing to invest in infrastructure projects linking Central Asia to Pakistan, says Zalmay Khalilzad.

At a Webinar in Washington this week, US Special Representative for Afghanistan Reconciliation also said that the Pakistani leadership “has been sending the right messages” for the success of Afghan peace talks.

“We have offered to meet with Iranians on this issue,” said Mr Khalilzad while responding to a question about Iran’s role in the Afghan peace process. “That they should join various fora, where we are and they are too, to discuss the future of Afghanistan.”

But the envoy, who leads US efforts for peacefully ending the Afghan war, also acknowledged that “Iran is a bit of a challenge”.

Khalilzad says Washington is willing to invest in infrastructure projects linking Central Asia to Pakistan

And “not because so much of Afghanistan, ... but because of the state of our relations with Iran,” he added. “I think Iran would like to keep us entangled in a conflict without winning or losing but paying a high price in Afghanistan until there is an agreement between the US and Iran.” Mr Khalilzad, however, warned that the US would respond if Iran-backed groups in Afghanistan acted against America and its coalition partners. “We are monitoring them very closely,” he said, adding that “there have been occasionally disturbing actions that have had a negative impact”.

Iran has denounced the US-Taliban peace deal signed in Doha, Qatar, in February this year. Mr Khalilzad played a key role in concluding the agreement, which envisions a US pullout from Afghanistan next May. The US envoy also praised Pakistan’s role in facilitating the talks that led to the deal.

Iran, however, has rejected the agreement because it believes that Washington is using it to legitimise the Taliban. Iran also has stepped up its own contacts with Afghan militants but rejects Washington’s claim that Tehran encourages militant attacks on Western forces.

Asked how the US planned to pull its troops out of Afghanistan, Mr Khalilzad said “being in Afghanistan militarily is not an end in itself for the US”.

Published in Dawn, September 29th, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

A difficult story
Updated 12 Jun, 2026

A difficult story

Unless productivity becomes the dominant target of economic policy, Pakistan will continue to oscillate between crises and fragile recovery.
Rough waters
12 Jun, 2026

Rough waters

AMONGST the key potential triggers for fresh conflict in South Asia is water. The Indian state is behaving in an...
Politicised football
12 Jun, 2026

Politicised football

ALMOST three-and-half years since Lionel Messi led Argentina to FIFA World Cup glory, the latest edition of...
GB polls’ aftermath
Updated 11 Jun, 2026

GB polls’ aftermath

The new administration must address the region’s issues proactively.
Peace in retreat
11 Jun, 2026

Peace in retreat

THE ceasefire announced in April was supposed to create space for negotiations. Instead, it has been repeatedly...
A few good men
11 Jun, 2026

A few good men

IT was a brave move, no doubt. This Tuesday, in the land of the Afghan Taliban, a few good men decided to take a...