Malik calls for filing of contempt case over reference against Justice Isa

Published February 18, 2020
Attorney General Anwar Mansoor will reply on Tuesday to the allegations levelled in a set of petitions challenging the filing of the presidential reference against Justice Qazi Faez Isa (pictured) of the Supreme Court. — Photo courtesy Supreme Court website/File
Attorney General Anwar Mansoor will reply on Tuesday to the allegations levelled in a set of petitions challenging the filing of the presidential reference against Justice Qazi Faez Isa (pictured) of the Supreme Court. — Photo courtesy Supreme Court website/File

ISLAMABAD: Attorney General Anwar Mansoor will reply on Tuesday to the allegations levelled in a set of petitions challenging the filing of the presidential reference against Justice Qazi Faez Isa of the Supreme Court.

Headed by Justice Umar Ata Bandial, a 10-judge full court was due to resume the hearing on the petitions on Monday, but since Justice Muneeb Akhtar was unable to attend the court because of indisposition, the hearing had to be adjourned to Tuesday.

The AG will defend not only the federal government’s stand on the reference, but also himself since he had also been named in the petitions. Monday’s highlight of the brief proceedings was the presence of Law Minister Farogh Naseem and Barrister Mirza Shahzad Akbar, who heads the Assets Recovery Unit (ARU).

Anwar Mansoor told the court that the law minister would also make a statement since his name was mentioned by different lawyers during the course of hearing.

On Monday, Hassan Irfan Khan, a petitioner, questioned the existing Supreme Judicial Council procedure of inquiry 2005, saying these rules were framed in 2005 through the Legal Framework Order, but since LFO could not survive after the adoption of the 18th Constitution Amendment, these rules too were no more in existence.

Senior counsel Munir Malik, who represents Justice Isa, submitted a synopsis in line with a previous court directive and requested for quashing the proceedings before the Supreme Judicial Council against Justice Isa.

He called for initiating a contempt case against all concerned and for action against all those who carried out surveillance of Justice Isa and his family.

Published in Dawn, February 18th, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

JAAC ban
Updated 07 Jun, 2026

JAAC ban

Though the JAAC’s demands are open to scrutiny, banning any political organisation — as long as it remains committed to peaceful activism — is undemocratic.
GB election
Updated 07 Jun, 2026

GB election

It is important that whichever party ultimately forms the government puts the needs of the people of GB above everything else.
ODI win
07 Jun, 2026

ODI win

AT last, the Pakistan cricket team had something to celebrate: a One-day International series victory against...
Trump rebuked
Updated 06 Jun, 2026

Trump rebuked

OBSERVERS across the world have long questioned the utility of Donald Trump’s now three-month-old war on Iran. But...
Hostile water motives
06 Jun, 2026

Hostile water motives

INDIA’S latest move to advance the Chenab-Beas Link Tunnel Project and its plan to flush silt from the Salal Dam...
Polio progress
06 Jun, 2026

Polio progress

PAKISTAN’S latest sub-national polio campaign offers encouraging evidence that the country can still push back...