VAT aspirations

Published April 21, 2019

IF the government follows through on its interest, conveyed to the IMF, of implementing a value added tax, it will be the first strategic economic reform measure announced by the PTI government. All the other moves thus far have either been raw adjustments, or virtually dead-on-arrival schemes such as separating tax policy from the FBR, a move that has proved largely abortive. VAT is perhaps the oldest item on Pakistan’s structural reform agenda, brought into an IMF programme back in 1988. It has remained a key structural reform measure on most Fund programmes signed since then, with the latest Extended Fund Facility of 2013 being an important exception. It was meant to be the single-most important way to document the economy, by getting business enterprises to submit the input and output prices of every item they sell and pay tax only on the difference. And it was a critical component meant to replace customs duties as the main revenue earner for the government as the base of taxation shifted away from taxing international trade towards taxing domestic consumption. That move proved abortive in Pakistan, which is one of the principal reasons why the country’s tax-to-GDP ratio has lagged behind, the state has been running persistent deficits and the tax system weighs on the economy like an albatross.

If this government decides to pick up this three-decade-old agenda item and give it one more push, it would be well advised to learn a few lessons from past. The last attempt to usher in a value added tax was under the stewardship of none other than the newly minted financial adviser, Hafeez Shaikh, when he was finance minister under the PPP government from 2010 till 2013. That episode saw a spectacular collapse as the draft legislation failed to pass in parliament. Stiff opposition from traders which was capitalised upon by the PML-N led to that situation. VAT faces an uphill task because too many of the goods being sold in Pakistan cannot come into the documented economy as they are smuggled, under-invoiced, or transacted using black money. It has practically nil political support. And the tax bureaucracy itself is opposed to it. Besides, the PTI government lacks the numbers in parliament to see the legislation through. VAT is a good idea, but it has costs if it fails.

Published in Dawn, April 21st, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

Dangerous law
Updated 17 May, 2024

Dangerous law

It must remember that the same law can be weaponised against it one day, just as Peca was when the PTI took power.
Uncalled for pressure
17 May, 2024

Uncalled for pressure

THE recent press conferences by Senators Faisal Vawda and Talal Chaudhry, where they demanded evidence from judges...
KP tussle
17 May, 2024

KP tussle

THE growing war of words between KP Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur and Governor Faisal Karim Kundi is affecting...
Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...