Alert Sign Dear reader, online ads enable us to deliver the journalism you value. Please support us by taking a moment to turn off Adblock on Dawn.com.

Alert Sign Dear reader, please upgrade to the latest version of IE to have a better reading experience

.

SC questions govt about Article 25-A implementation

Updated April 10, 2019

Email

State is forcing people to opt for private education and pressurising private institutions not to charge much, observes Justice Khosa. — Photo courtesy Supreme Court/File
State is forcing people to opt for private education and pressurising private institutions not to charge much, observes Justice Khosa. — Photo courtesy Supreme Court/File

ISLAMABAD: The apparent failure of the state to provide quality education caught attention of the Supreme Court that asked the federal and provincial governments on Tuesday to come up with facts about fulfilling the constitutional obligation in the education sector.

“Attorney General Anwar Mansoor as well as advocate generals for the provincial governments should appear before the court on Monday with complete data along with information regarding fulfilment of the obligation under Article 25-A of the Constitution,” said Chief Justice of Pakistan Asif Saeed Khosa while heading a three-judge bench.

Article 25-A deals with the right to education and obligates the state to provide ‘free’ and ‘compulsory’ education to all children of the age between five and 16 years in such a manner as may be determined by the law.

State is forcing people to opt for private education and pressurising private institutions not to charge much, observes Justice Khosa

The bench that had taken up a set of cases relating to education and fee increase by private educational institutions also dropped hints that the matter would be heard on a day to day basis from next Monday.

Earlier, the Supreme Court in its Dec 13, 2018 decision had ordered private schools to slash fee in excess of Rs5,000 by 20 per cent. The apex court had also highlighted the need of developing a mechanism to counter resistance on the part of private schools to undermine regulatory steps explaining that such resistance shown by the private schools include reduction of facilities in schools, increase in number of students in classes, reduction of teaching staff, reduction in their salaries and other related matters.

Citing his own example, Chief Justice Asif Khosa recalled how he went to a government school and then to a government college and though he continued his educational pursuits at the Cambridge University and the Lincoln’s Inn, he never experienced any disadvantage of being educated at government schools because the quality of education was good then. “Earlier, we used to see government schools almost in every street or locality, but now no such educational institutions are in sight,” he regretted.

Justice Khosa said sheer talent was being wasted merely because parents could not afford to pay high fee of the private schools whereas the state did not seem serious about fulfilling its constitutional obligation of providing quality education.

“Hapless people have no choice but to send their children to madressahs,” the chief justice observed, adding that people would get choice if the state provided uniform education with free textbooks.

Justice Khosa was of the opinion that the issue of excessive fee by private schools was there only because people had no choice. Instead of laying emphasis upon the state to enhance facilities at government schools along with good quality education, private schools were being asked to cut fee, he observed.

Justice Faisal Arab said past experience showed that by putting curbs and restrictions on the industry, industrial growth was hampered hugely in Pakistan.

However, Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan said private institutions could not be given a free hand. He observed that it was the fundamental right of children to get education.

According to the CJP, the fundamental problem is that the state is coming up with an argument that they have failed on account of fulfilling their constitutional obligation but they will not allow private institutions to enhance school fee.

“The state itself is forcing people to opt for private educational institutions and at the same time also pressurising the institutions not to charge much,” Justice Khosa observed, adding that the state should be asked what had been done to fulfil the constitutional obligation. He wondered how the government could cap the private facilities.

Published in Dawn, April 10th, 2019