Notices issued in plea against PTV MD’s hiring

Published March 2, 2019
PTV MD's appointment has become a 'bone of contention'. — File
PTV MD's appointment has become a 'bone of contention'. — File

ISLAMABAD: Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Friday issued notices to the secretary information and broadcasting and members of the governing board of Pakistan Television (PTV) on a petition filed against the alleged controversial appointment of Managing Director (MD) Arshad Khan.

Pervaiz Akhter Bhatti, Secretary General AllPTV Employees and Workers Union CBA, in his petition requested the court to set aside the notification giving the acting charge of PTV to Mr Khan and declare steps taken by him as illegal. He also sought a decree against the PTV board of directors.

The appointment of the MD as well as the board of directors of the state-run television has become a ‘bone of contention’ between information minister Chaudhry Fawad Hussain and prime minister’s special assistant on political affairs Naeemul Haq.

While the information minister is against the MD and always spoke against him in the public, Mr Haq tweeted last week: “The Prime Minister has full confidence in the Board of PTV and its management and believes PTV should be an independent organisation like BBC and the government will take all steps necessary towards that end.”

Mr Hussain promptly responded by quoting Mirza Ghalib’s famous verse: Hua hai Shah ka musahib phiray hay itrata, wagarna shehar mai Ghalilb ki abro kya hai. [His elevation to the king has made him arrogant otherwise he is worthless.]

Before the IHC, Ali Nawaz Kharal, counsel for the petitioner, argued that giving the acting charge of MD to Mr Khan and his appointment as the chairman board of directors were against the law and the judgment of the Supreme Court.

He said the apex court in a case related to the appointment of Ataul Haq Qasmi as the MD PTV had laid down certain criteria which were ignored while appointing Mr Khan.

He requested the court to declare the appointment as illegal.

The court issued notices to MD PTV and other respondents, including secretary information, and adjourned hearing to March 7.

Published in Dawn, March 2nd, 2019

Opinion

Digital finance
17 Jan 2021

Digital finance

Raast offers opportunities for inclusion, but is not without risk.
Broadsheetgate
Updated 17 Jan 2021

Broadsheetgate

The competence that has underlined NAB and its actions has cost us dearly now and even in 2008.
Debate on ordinances
17 Jan 2021

Debate on ordinances

The government’s line of thinking indicates a belief in the principle of brute majority.
America in decline?
Updated 16 Jan 2021

America in decline?

In spite of the ‘gates’ that rocked the US, democracy stood firm.

Editorial

Updated 17 Jan 2021

Foreign funding case

THE Election Commission of Pakistan has summoned both the PML-N and PPP on Monday in connection with the foreign...
17 Jan 2021

Vaccine procurement

ALL eyes are on the government as it pledges to roll out the Covid-19 vaccination programme to about 80m citizens by...
17 Jan 2021

Makli ‘renovation’

THERE are fears that the recently conducted ‘renovation’ work carried out at the Makli necropolis may rob the...
16 Jan 2021

Gas liberalisation

AFTER drawing much criticism from both consumers and the opposition over its mismanagement of the energy sector that...
16 Jan 2021

Osama Satti inquiry

THE findings of the judicial inquiry into the Jan 2 killing of 21-year-old Osama Satti in Islamabad merely confirms...
Updated 16 Jan 2021

British MP on IHK

DESPITE sustained efforts by New Delhi’s rulers to remove India-held Kashmir from the global discourse, people of...