Pakistan Railways land not to be sold or leased for over five years: SC

Published January 4, 2019
Minister for Railways Sheikh Rashid assured the court that Pakistan Railways would not not sell "even one marla of land". ─ File photo
Minister for Railways Sheikh Rashid assured the court that Pakistan Railways would not not sell "even one marla of land". ─ File photo

The Supreme Court on Friday while hearing a case on the sale of Pakistan Railways' land at throwaway prices ordered that Railways-owned land within the jurisdiction of the Centre and provinces cannot be sold or leased out for more than five years.

Chief Justice of Pakistan Mian Saqib Nisar, who was heading the three-judge bench hearing the case, observed that Railways land is owned by the federal government, and while the provinces may use it, they cannot sell it as its sale is banned.

"The Railways department can give the land on lease, but it can't sell it," Justice Nisar explained. "But that doesn't mean that such land should be leased for 99 years."

Minister for Railways Sheikh Rashid, who was present in court today, assured the bench that Pakistan Railways would not sell "even one marla of land".

"Some land has been leased out for three to five years, and we receive Rs3 billion annual income through leasing Railways land," he informed the court. "If you terminate the leases, then Railways will suffer financial losses."

The court subsequently stopped Pakistan Railways from selling its land within the jurisdiction of the Centre or provinces, and ruled that land in Railways use cannot be sold.

The court ordered that land in the jurisdiction of the Centre or provinces could not be leased out for more than five years, and that only land which is not needed for Railways operations can be leased out.

Pakistan Railways will not have permission to build any housing society, the court ruled, also ordering the department to ensure it does not allow any illegal occupation of the land in its use.

The Supreme Court said that the Royal Palm Golf and Country Club case would be separated from this issue and heard independently, adding that its interim order in the Royal Palm case would remain in place and that audit firm Ferguson had been given administrative control of the club for the time being.

The case regarding the use of Railways land was subsequently disposed off.

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.