SAN FRANCISCO, June 18: Two Pakistani Americans, father and son, were indicted on Thursday by a federal grand jury on charges that they lied to the FBI investigating links to terrorist camps in Pakistan connected to Al Qaeda. However, Hamid Hayat, 22, and his father Umer Hayat, 47, were not charged with terrorism. Hamid Hayat is charged with two counts of making a false statement to FBI agents, and Umer Hayat is charged with one count of making a false statement to FBI agents.

The indictment says Hamid Hayat was lying when he denied being with any type of terrorist organization and denied attending any type of terrorist training camp. In an affidavit, the FBI said Hamid Hayat attended a terror camp for about six months before returning to the US intending to wage attacks.

The indictment says his father Umer Hayat was lying when he denied having any first-hand knowledge of terrorist training camps in Pakistan.

Hamid Hayat’s lawyer, Wazhma Mojaddidi said she was not surprised by the indictments, but said her client was innocent. In a statement, Wazhma Mojaddidi said: “My client is not a terrorist. He does not associate with any terrorist organizations or support any terrorist activities, and he has most definitely never attended a terrorist training camp.”

Umer Hayat’s attorney, Johnny Griffin III, echoed her statements and said the allegations in the indictments would only create more panic and sensation in Muslim community.

“If the FBI had any credible evidence that Umer Hayat had actually visited terrorist training camps in Pakistan, and that his son actually attended one or more jihadi training camps, such evidence would have been presented to the grand jury and terrorist-related charges would have been returned in the indictment,” Mr Griffin said in a written statement.

On Thursday, two civil right groups held a news conference outside the federal courthouse in Sacramento and said they would file complaints with the FBI and US Attorney’s Office that Muslims were being harassed.

Opinion

Rule by law

Rule by law

‘The rule of law’ is being weaponised, taking on whatever meaning that fits the political objectives of those invoking it.

Editorial

Isfahan strikes
20 Apr, 2024

Isfahan strikes

THE Iran-Israel shadow war has very much come out into the open. Tel Aviv had been targeting Tehran’s assets for...
President’s speech
20 Apr, 2024

President’s speech

PRESIDENT Asif Ali Zardari seems to have managed to hit all the right notes in his address to the joint sitting of...
Karachi terror
20 Apr, 2024

Karachi terror

IS urban terrorism returning to Karachi? Yesterday’s deplorable suicide bombing attack on a van carrying five...
X post facto
Updated 19 Apr, 2024

X post facto

Our decision-makers should realise the harm they are causing.
Insufficient inquiry
19 Apr, 2024

Insufficient inquiry

UNLESS the state is honest about the mistakes its functionaries have made, we will be doomed to repeat our follies....
Melting glaciers
19 Apr, 2024

Melting glaciers

AFTER several rain-related deaths in KP in recent days, the Provincial Disaster Management Authority has sprung into...