Generation Wealth takes a deep look at the shallowness of greed

Published July 27, 2018
Photographs from Lauren Greenfield’s book Fast Forward appear throughout her new documentary Generation Wealth. The subject of this 1993 photo, a teenager at Beverly Hills High School identified only as Mijanou, also appears in the film, reflecting on how her life, at 42, has changed.
Photographs from Lauren Greenfield’s book Fast Forward appear throughout her new documentary Generation Wealth. The subject of this 1993 photo, a teenager at Beverly Hills High School identified only as Mijanou, also appears in the film, reflecting on how her life, at 42, has changed.

PHOTOGRAPHER and film-maker Lauren Greenfield has made a career out of documenting the culture of conspicuous consumption and the commodification of all things — including the human body. In her 2006 feature documentary debut, Thin, about women with eating disorders, and the 2012 The Queen of Versailles, about a wealthy couple’s attempt to build a house in Florida modeled after the French royal palace, Greenfield has turned her camera on an America obsessed with the superficial.

It’s an obsession that has fascinated her for 25 years, ever since Greenfield found the first expression of her artistic voice in photographs of teenagers in Los Angeles, a project that would go on to become the acclaimed and disturbing 1997 book Fast Forward: Growing Up in the Shadow of Hollywood.

Greenfield’s latest documentary, Generation Wealth, is both a continuation of that obsession and a reflection upon it. In a sense, the film is a kind of double portrait, one in which the Los Angeles-bred artist and armchair anthropologist sees herself reflected in the mirror of her work, along with her self-regarding subjects. Of the world of privilege and perverse values that she has come to examine so closely — in books, exhibitions and films that dissect unfettered capitalism and the craving for more — she describes herself as both “critic and participant”.

What’s missing, however, from this self-examination is perspective.

Although Generation Wealth features Greenfield’s first-person narration, as well as interviews with her psychologist mother, Patricia Marks Greenfield, and home-movie-style footage of Greenfield with her sons and husband, the insights into Greenfield’s own psyche feel more scant and superficial than those she gleans from others. Meaty interviews with journalist Chris Hedges, for instance, lend the film needed context and a sense of intellectual detachment.

In one segment, Hedges opines that modern society’s lack of upward mobility — its class inelasticity — has made the outward appearance of wealth matter disproportionately more than ever. We desire $700 shoes, gilded bling and other trappings of the “haves”, because we want to disguise the fact that we are the have-nots.

Needless to say, Donald Trump appears in the film, if only in passing, about a half-hour in, when the businessman turned president’s role as an avatar of the American Dream — a self-made mogul, or so he would have us believe — is held up as an explanation of his political ascendancy. We voted for him, in other words, because we want to be him, or at least to believe the version of him we saw on The Apprentice. (Generation Wealth is distributed by Amazon Studios. Amazon chief executive Jeffrey Bezos owns The Washington Post.)

Interviews with the subjects, now 40-ish, of Fast Forward, paired with shots from the book of their former, less introspective adolescent selves, also add useful substance and poignant wisdom. Florian Homm, the wealthy German former hedge fund manager who went on the lam in 2007 after being charged with investment fraud by the US government, appears in interviews too. Homm comes across as unchastened, but at least more cautious about the empty promises of the prosperity gospel. “If you think that money will buy you anything and everything,” he says, “you’ve never, ever had money.”

Greenfield, for the most part, wisely leaves the preaching to others. If Generation Wealth has a message that empty acquisitiveness is bad, it delivers it, like the rest of her work, by showing, not telling.

—By arrangement with The Washington Post

Published in Dawn, July 27th, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

JAAC ban
Updated 07 Jun, 2026

JAAC ban

Though the JAAC’s demands are open to scrutiny, banning any political organisation — as long as it remains committed to peaceful activism — is undemocratic.
GB election
Updated 07 Jun, 2026

GB election

It is important that whichever party ultimately forms the government puts the needs of the people of GB above everything else.
ODI win
07 Jun, 2026

ODI win

AT last, the Pakistan cricket team had something to celebrate: a One-day International series victory against...
Trump rebuked
Updated 06 Jun, 2026

Trump rebuked

OBSERVERS across the world have long questioned the utility of Donald Trump’s now three-month-old war on Iran. But...
Hostile water motives
06 Jun, 2026

Hostile water motives

INDIA’S latest move to advance the Chenab-Beas Link Tunnel Project and its plan to flush silt from the Salal Dam...
Polio progress
06 Jun, 2026

Polio progress

PAKISTAN’S latest sub-national polio campaign offers encouraging evidence that the country can still push back...