KARACHI: Social media giant Facebook blocked a 2017 post by Dawn.com for users in Pakistan — the post provides a link to a story on veteran politician Javed Hashmi criticising the judiciary.

“Due to legal restrictions in your country, we’ve limited access to your post on Facebook,” the social media website said in an automated message. The post, however, is still accessible via VPN in the country.

The company said that it had made the content unavailable “based on local law” in an action that is usually taken after requests from state institutions under non-transparent agreements — a fact that media and human rights organisations have criticised in the past.

Facebook did not clarify what law the Dawn.com post had violated, nor did it specify where the request had originated from.

Under fire for privacy concerns, hate speech and its role in ‘influencing’ the US elections, this form of censorship under directives by governments is nothing new for Facebook. The platform, with over 1.9 billion users across the globe, has controversially restricted access to content. The website’s censorship policies also led to many user accounts being blocked or deleted in 2016 for posts criticising India following the killing of held Kashmir’s young freedom fighter Burhan Wani.

Under increasing pressure

According to a transparency report issued by Facebook, the Pakistani government sent 1,050 requests for data to Facebook between January and June 2017, compared to only 719 during the same period in the preceding year.

It also said that 177 pieces of content were restricted from viewership in the country on requests forwarded by the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority and the Federal Investigation Agency for violating “local laws prohibiting blasphemy and condemnation of the country’s independence”.

Facebook had also found itself directly in the line of fire last year when an Islamabad High Court judge, Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui, and then interior minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan had threatened to completely ban the social network if it did not act to remove all blasphemous content from its platform.

Upcoming elections

With the Cambridge Analytica scandal still looming large, Facebook had said regarding elections in Pakistan that it would take steps to “curb outside election interference”.

However, with its current censorship policy in place, removal of content through non-transparent mechanisms — as in the removal of Dawn.com’s post — may cut users off from information that is vital to making informed voting decisions.

Published in Dawn, May 12th, 2018

Opinion

Digital finance
17 Jan 2021

Digital finance

Raast offers opportunities for inclusion, but is not without risk.
Broadsheetgate
Updated 17 Jan 2021

Broadsheetgate

The competence that has underlined NAB and its actions has cost us dearly now and even in 2008.
Debate on ordinances
17 Jan 2021

Debate on ordinances

The government’s line of thinking indicates a belief in the principle of brute majority.
America in decline?
Updated 16 Jan 2021

America in decline?

In spite of the ‘gates’ that rocked the US, democracy stood firm.

Editorial

Updated 17 Jan 2021

Foreign funding case

THE Election Commission of Pakistan has summoned both the PML-N and PPP on Monday in connection with the foreign...
17 Jan 2021

Vaccine procurement

ALL eyes are on the government as it pledges to roll out the Covid-19 vaccination programme to about 80m citizens by...
17 Jan 2021

Makli ‘renovation’

THERE are fears that the recently conducted ‘renovation’ work carried out at the Makli necropolis may rob the...
16 Jan 2021

Gas liberalisation

AFTER drawing much criticism from both consumers and the opposition over its mismanagement of the energy sector that...
16 Jan 2021

Osama Satti inquiry

THE findings of the judicial inquiry into the Jan 2 killing of 21-year-old Osama Satti in Islamabad merely confirms...
Updated 16 Jan 2021

British MP on IHK

DESPITE sustained efforts by New Delhi’s rulers to remove India-held Kashmir from the global discourse, people of...