KARACHI: Foreign Minister Khawaja Asif has criticised the announcement made by Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) chairman Imran Khan about initiation of disciplinary action against his party’s members of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa assembly who indulged in “horse-trading”, and termed the move an eyewash.

The Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz leader, who is widely known as a staunch critic of the PTI, tweeted a news report regarding Mr Khan’s press conference in which he alleged that 20 lawmakers had received Rs40 million each to “sell” their votes in the Senate elections.

Mr Asif made it clear that he wasn’t impressed by the move and said that at a time when the five-year term of the assemblies was about to be completed such an action appeared to be “mere eyewash [rang baazi]”.

The senior politician from Sialkot tweeted that the PTI decision, however, had put the “institutions, particularly the Senate,” in a difficult position. “What will be the fate of the newly-elected Senators from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and the chairman and deputy chairman [of the Senate] elected on the votes of those senators?; whole process is void ab initio,” he added.

Published in Dawn, April 19th, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

Impending slaughter
Updated 07 May, 2024

Impending slaughter

Seven months into the slaughter, there are no signs of hope.
Wheat investigation
07 May, 2024

Wheat investigation

THE Shehbaz Sharif government is in a sort of Catch-22 situation regarding the alleged wheat import scandal. It is...
Naila’s feat
07 May, 2024

Naila’s feat

IN an inspirational message from the base camp of Nepal’s Mount Makalu, Pakistani mountaineer Naila Kiani stressed...
Plugging the gap
06 May, 2024

Plugging the gap

IN Pakistan, bias begins at birth for the girl child as discriminatory norms, orthodox attitudes and poverty impede...
Terrains of dread
Updated 06 May, 2024

Terrains of dread

Restored faith in the police is unachievable without political commitment and interprovincial support.
Appointment rules
Updated 06 May, 2024

Appointment rules

If the judiciary had the power to self-regulate, it ought to have exercised it instead of involving the legislature.