LAHORE: A Lahore High Court full bench on Tuesday issued notices to federal and provincial governments and the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) on petitions challenging the dharna (sit-in) of opposition parties being held today (Wednesday) on The Mall.

The three-judge bench headed by Justice Aminuddin Khan also sought personal appearance of Punjab Advocate General Shakilur Rehman Khan in the court today (Wednesday) when the hearing would resume at 9am. Mall Road Traders Association and Lawyers’ Foundation had filed the petitions with a prayer to restrain the Pakistan Awami Tehreek (PAT), PPP, Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) and Jamaat-i-Islami (JI) from staging the sit-in on The Mall since there was a ban on holding protest activities in the area.

Advocate Asad Manzoor Butt represented the traders and argued before the court that the provincial government had in 2011 put a ban on holding protests, rallies and sit-in on The Mall on the direction of the high court.

He pointed out that the government under a legislation allocated Nasser Bagh for such activities, but the ban had never been implemented by the government.

He said business activities had severely been affected due to protests on The Mall since the area was a commercial hub of the city.

He asked the bench to restrain the opposition parties from holding sit-in on The Mall.

Representing the other petitioner, Advocate A K Dogar argued that staging protests against a lawfully elected government was not only unconstitutional but also a violation of Section 124-A (sedition) of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC). He said the protest would lead the country to anarchy and paralyse the system, causing a huge financial loss to the people and the country.

He asked the court to declare the sit-in by the opposition parties an act of disloyalty to the State and a violation of the fundamental rights enjoyed by other peaceful citizens of the country.

However, the bench did not pass any stay order and issued notices to the respondents for today (Wednesday).

Justice Shahid Jamil and Justice Shahid Karim are the other members of the bench.

Earlier in the day, a full bench headed by Justice Farrukh Irfan Khan refused to hear the same petitions for personal reasons. Later, Chief Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah formed the full bench headed by Justice Aminuddin Khan which took up the matter same day.

Published in Dawn, January 17th, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

Missing in action
17 Mar, 2026

Missing in action

NOT exactly known for playing a proactive role in protecting the interests of Muslim nations and populations...
Risk to stability
Updated 17 Mar, 2026

Risk to stability

THE risks to Pakistan’s fragile economic recovery from the US-Israel war on Iran cannot be dismissed. Yet the...
Enrolment push
17 Mar, 2026

Enrolment push

THE federal government has embarked upon the welcome initiative to enrol 25,000 out-of-school children in Islamabad...
Holding the line
16 Mar, 2026

Holding the line

PAKISTAN’S long battle against polio has recently produced encouraging signs. Data from the national eradication...
Power self-reliance
Updated 16 Mar, 2026

Power self-reliance

PAKISTAN’S transition to domestic sources of electricity is a welcome development for a country that has long been...
Looking for safety
16 Mar, 2026

Looking for safety

AS the Middle East conflict enters its third week, the war’s most enduring victims are not those who wage it....