Exchange rate depreciation

Published December 10, 2017

ON Friday morning, the interbank market for foreign currency had a rude awakening as the rupee plunged against the dollar, and, just like last July, no attempts were made by the State Bank to shore up its value. Rumours filled the air as the rupee fell beyond 109 to a dollar, before stabilising at 107 by the close of trade.

“This movement in the exchange rate is based on demand and supply of foreign exchange in the interbank market,” the central bank said in a press release issued only a couple of hours later, adding, “[t]he exchange rate will continue to reflect the demand and supply conditions”.

Also read: In talks with IMF, Pakistan agrees to depreciate rupee

It appears that the old days of central bank intervention to maintain an overvalued exchange rate are over.

On Monday, we will see to what extent the State Bank’s resolve will hold, and how far the rupee has to go before it finds its true value “based on demand and supply of foreign exchange in the interbank market”.

Whatever happens in the days to come, we can only hope that there is a firm hand on the tiller as the economy enters choppy waters. But these hopes are hanging on a weak peg, because the State Bank’s acknowledgement of the exchange rate implications of the widening current account deficit now appears to be coming out of thin air. After all, only a fortnight ago in its November monetary policy statement (which now reads like a joke, incidentally), the State Bank was assuring us that all is well, that exports and remittances are ticking upwards, that the regulatory duties will sort out those pesky non-essential imports. And a mere 10 working days later the same State Bank is telling us that “the continuation of high growth in imports led to a widening of current account deficit, and consequently to depletion in the country’s foreign exchange reserves”, and, of course, an abrupt depreciation in the exchange rate.

Did the current account deficit widen in these 10 days alone? Did those who took exactly the same step back on July 5, only to be shouted down, have a point after all?

The decision to let the rupee find its own value was necessary. The dogged refusal of the former finance minister to even entertain the possibility was causing grave damage to the economy. But it is a little difficult to believe that the decision has been taken autonomously at the State Bank, and that the talks under way with the IMF for post-programme monitoring had nothing to do with it.

This is why it is so important for the State Bank to be led by a strong and independent governor, who is not afraid to use his voice to prevent embarrassments of this sort, where the central bank has to be led like a toddler to the dining table to eat his own words.

Published in Dawn, December 10th, 2017

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...