A complex war

Published October 22, 2017

A SURGE in violence has bloodily exposed the increasing complexity of the war in Afghanistan. On the enemy and insurgent side, there appear to be three principal actors: the Afghan Taliban, the Haqqani network and the militant Islamic State group. Each has claimed or is believed to be responsible for a devastating attack in recent days across Afghanistan. Meanwhile, under the new, looser rules of engagement authorised by US President Donald Trump, US forces in Afghanistan have unleashed a dramatic aerial bombing and drone strikes campaign with the apparent aim of militarily pummelling all three. In addition, the traditional winter lull in fighting may not occur as militants switch tactics away from large raids on towns and towards more devastating small raids and suicide bombings. However, at least when it comes to the fight against IS, the US, Pakistan and Afghanistan can agree that it should be fought urgently and with great intensity. There may not be a direct link between the IS strongholds in the Middle East and Afghanistan, but the severe pressure that IS is under in the former could become a factor in its rejuvenation elsewhere. IS having found more than a foothold in Afghanistan and Pakistan, any state that contributes to the fight against it ought to be welcomed.

Clearly, the fight in Afghanistan against the Afghan Taliban and the Haqqani network presents a trickier international problem. A surge in bombings across Afghanistan attributed to the Afghan Taliban and the Haqqani network will invariably increase US pressure on Pakistan to act against alleged sanctuaries on Pakistani soil. Moreover, the Trump administration’s interest in participating in a dialogue with the Afghan Taliban is in doubt, suggesting that the military aspect of US policy will dominate in Afghanistan, potentially causing ripple effects inside Pakistan. For Pakistan, the challenges are profound: continuing to secure the country from domestic and cross-border militancy; helping advance an intra-Afghan dialogue in the face of either hostility or lack of interest by the US; and fending off the Trump administration’s more belligerent demands that could trigger violence and political upheaval. The recent diplomacy and military interactions that Pakistan has undertaken should be sustained and widened. As past periods of great instability have demonstrated, the absence of high-level and direct communications among Pakistan, Afghanistan and the US tends to worsen tensions. Now is the time for commonsense and calm statecraft.

Published in Dawn, October 22nd, 2017

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...