Alert Sign Dear reader, online ads enable us to deliver the journalism you value. Please support us by taking a moment to turn off Adblock on

Alert Sign Dear reader, please upgrade to the latest version of IE to have a better reading experience


KARACHI: FIFA’s Member Associations Committee finally seems to have had enough. And that could mean that the Pakistan Football Federation (PFF) dispute is finally resolved, despite a looming FIFA ban.

With Pakistan football having come to a standstill for the last two years, and with seemingly no progress made since FIFA gave the PFF faction led by Faisal Saleh Hayat a two-year mandate to ratify statutes and hold fresh elections in September 2015, it’s Member Associations Committee has put its foot down and called for stringent measures for a similar directive.

It comes following a request by Asian Football Confederation (AFC) to the world’s football governing body in May to give Hayat’s PFF two more years so that “meaningful reforms can be undertaken”.

“It was discussed that the potential extension of the deadline [from 30 September 2017 to 30 June 2019] to revise the PFF statutes and organise elections will be conditional on the strict implementation of an action plan and a regular reporting mechanism,” a FIFA spokesperson told Dawn on the discussions that took place during the committee’s meeting last week.

The Member Associations Committee, however, also pointed out that an administrator has been appointed by the court to manage PFF affairs. And that, it said, could be grounds for a ban.

The PFF dispute began after a controversial election of the Punjab Football Association (PFA) in April 2015 that saw the country’s football governing body split into two factions heading into its presidential poll in June.

With both factions heading into elections, the Lahore High Court intervened and ordered a stay on the elections but the Hayat group went ahead and conducted the election in the presence of an AFC observer. It was a move that saw the LHC appoint an administrator to control the PFF affairs until the matter is resolved.

“The Committee pointed out that, while court proceedings are still ongoing, the court appointed administrator continues to occupy the PFF offices and to control its accounts,” added the FIFA spokesperson.

“Therefore, the Committee decided that if the PFF offices and access to the PFF accounts are not returned to the PFF leadership — led by Mr Makhdoom Syed Faisal Saleh Hayat — by 31 July 2017, it would recommend to the FIFA Council to suspend the PFF for contravening its obligations under articles 14 and 19 of the FIFA Statutes.”

The relevant clauses seem to be regarding third party influence but member associations are also required to “ratify statutes that are in accordance with the requirements of the FIFA Standard Statutes”.

One of the major reasons for the PFF splitting into two factions were several changes made to the PFF constitution, with Hayat’s opponents claiming they were meant to keep him in power, and on a seat he’s held on since 2003.

It remains to be seen whether the Bureau of the FIFA Council, which has the FIFA president and presidents of all six continental confederations, goes forth with the ban.

For the last few years, the AFC has been pressing its support to keep Hayat in power and a ban could detrimental for that plan despite the faction led by him repeatedly threatening that it would be coming.

A FIFA ban usually leads to an interim committee being formed to conduct the elections. Till the election date is finalised, football activity is resumed while there are also integrity checks on election candidates.

Published in Dawn, July 13th, 2017