WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump came to the White House promising a radical reset of US-Russia relations after years of rising tensions under his predecessor.

But barely one month into office, that plan appears to be on hold, and Trump’s White House team has taken on an increasingly Russophobic face.

After he repeatedly pledged to reach “a deal” with Vladimir Putin while hinting at downgraded relations with Nato and the European Union, Trump has yet to set a meeting with the Russian leader.

Meanwhile, Vice President Mike Pence and top cabinet security and defence officials have gone to great lengths to reassure European leaders that Washington is not giving up on its allies.

While Trump still holds out the idea of striking up an amicable relationship with Putin, the administration took a distinct turn away from that stance last week with the replacement of pro-Moscow national security adviser Michael Flynn with Lt Gen HR McMaster, a hawkish army veteran who sees Russia as the primary threat to US interests and global stability.

And next week the Senate is expected to approve the appointment of Senator Dan Coats as Director of National Intelligence, adding another Putin sceptic to the president’s defence and national security team.

“There has been a major shift,” said Bruce Jones, vice president and director for foreign policy at the Brookings Institution think tank in Washington. “My sense is at least we’ve seen an evolution to an approach that is more sensitive to the threat Russia poses to Europe and the US.”

Jake Sullivan, the former national security adviser to vice president Joe Biden, said the White House policy situation is “still unsettled”. However, he said, McMaster’s arrival in Flynn’s place “could tip the balance.”

Allaying European worries

Trump has long expressed admiration for Putin and other hard-as-nails Russian autocrats.

But his hope of launching into the presidency with a new approach to Russia has been set back by scandals that have allowed critics to paint him as suspiciously soft on Moscow: the intelligence conclusion that Russia interfered in the US election to hurt Trump’s rival Hillary Clinton; alleged links between some of his campaign advisers and Russian intelligence; and the need to fire Flynn over his private discussions on sanctions with Russia’s ambassador.

The seeming slowdown or shift in his stance was most noteworthy, Jones said, with efforts in the past two weeks to assuage nervous European leaders over the new Washington administration’s intentions.

During the campaign Trump had repeatedly criticised Nato and suggested the core Atlantic Alliance may have passed its expiration date.

But last week Pence declared at a high-level Munich security conference, with German leader Angela Merkel in the audience, that the administration remains committed to strong transatlantic ties.

“The United States is and will always be your greatest ally. Be assured that President Trump and our people are truly devoted to our transatlantic union,” he said.

Days earlier new Pentagon chief James Mattis told officials in Brussels that the Nato alliance was a “fundamental bedrock” for the United States.

Trump still wants ‘deal’ with Putin

Trump’s efforts to strike a new footing with Moscow have not gone away, and he and his close adviser Steve Bannon still set the agenda.

They have suggested a readiness to lighten tough sanctions placed on Russia by the previous administration over its seizure of Crimea in exchange for cooperation elsewhere, particularly in fighting Islamic extremism.

“If we could get along, it would be a positive thing, not a negative thing,” Trump reiterated in a press conference on Feb 16. “It would be much easier for me to be tough on Russia, but then we’re not going to make a deal.”

Taking on anti-Moscow hardliners could help Trump pursue overtures with Putin from a position of strength, analysts say.

But Sullivan said that, even with the build-up of hawkish conservatives in the White House, “there is still not a consensus inside the administration”.

“Trump can still get on the phone with Putin from time to time and do deals.”—AFP

Published in Dawn, February 26th, 2017

Opinion

Budgeting without people

Budgeting without people

Even though the economy is a critical issue, discussions about it involve a select few who are not really interested in communicating with the people.

Editorial

Iranian tragedy
Updated 21 May, 2024

Iranian tragedy

Due to Iran’s regional and geopolitical influence, the world will be watching the power transition carefully.
Circular debt woes
21 May, 2024

Circular debt woes

THE alleged corruption and ineptitude of the country’s power bureaucracy is proving very costly. New official data...
Reproductive health
21 May, 2024

Reproductive health

IT is naïve to imagine that reproductive healthcare counts in Pakistan, where women from low-income groups and ...
Wheat price crash
Updated 20 May, 2024

Wheat price crash

What the government has done to Punjab’s smallholder wheat growers by staying out of the market amid crashing prices is deplorable.
Afghan corruption
20 May, 2024

Afghan corruption

AMONGST the reasons that the Afghan Taliban marched into Kabul in August 2021 without any resistance to speak of ...
Volleyball triumph
20 May, 2024

Volleyball triumph

IN the last week, while Pakistan’s cricket team savoured a come-from-behind T20 series victory against Ireland,...