ISLAMABAD: A Senate panel on Tuesday recommended party-based elections in the federal capital.

A meeting of the Senate Standing Committee on Interior, held with former interior minister Rehman Malik in the chair, considered the draft of the local government law for Islamabad already passed by the National Assembly.

Talking to Dawn after the meeting, Rehman Malik said the Lahore High Court’s judgment ordering holding of party-based elections had attained finality as the same had not been challenged before the Supreme Court. He said holding non-party polls would be a violation of the high court’s orders.

He said the Supreme Court, in its judgment, had asked the ECP to announce the schedule in anticipation of a legislation adding that the committee had advised the ECP to go into review and a petition had already been filed by it. He said the government had been asked by the panel to become a party in the case within three days.

He said a representative of the government proposed a blanket cover to all actions so far taken by the ECP in connection with the LG elections in the absence of a law, but the proposal was turned down by the committee.

He said a report, spread over 250 pages, had been prepared by the committee in which various amendments to the law were proposed. He said the committee had recommended appropriate division of powers between the Capital Development Authority and the proposed metropolitan corporation.

The committee will now submit a report to the Senate for consideration. The Senate is now set to adopt the bill passed by the National Assembly with certain amendments. The bill adopted with amendments will then be sent to the National Assembly and if the assembly agrees with the amendments, the bill will stand passed and sent to the president for assent. However, if the National Assembly disagrees with the amendments, a joint session of the parliament will have to be convened to decide.

Published in Dawn, July 1st, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...