LAHORE: Former prime minister Yousuf Raza Gilani on Thursday contradicted the claim of the former chairman of Nadra in a reply to the Federal Investigation Agency’s notice in the controversy of the ‘missing’ necklace donated by the Turkish First Lady.

In a written response to the FIA questionnaire, Gilani said: “The stance taken by the former Nadra chairman is not based on facts. Rather it has been made a cover story. The facts are different. The spouse of then Turkish prime minister Recep Tayyib Erdogan (now president) had never participated in the eight-couple (wedding) ceremony in Sindh in 2010. She never gave the said necklace on this occasion to any one, nor I directed its auction. I never ordered the Nadra chairman (to make) payment for the necklace. In fact the Nadra chairman voluntarily paid the amount to the newly-married couples. Since payment was made by him, as per his statement, it was his duty to get the necklace from the staff of the Prime Minister House. But, unfortunately, he did not make an attempt to get the same from the staff of the PM House. And since it was not demanded back the staff of the PM House handed over the same (necklace) to my personal staff.” Mr Gilani further said: “It is worth mentioning here that my personal staff never informed me that the necklace in question is still with us. However, when the matter came up in the media my personal staff told me that the necklace was in their custody. Upon which I directed them to deposit it in the Toshakhana (treasure-house) on Friday (today) without delay.”

Former Nadra chairman Ali Arshad Hakeem had reportedly claimed he had purchased the necklace so that it could be returned to the Turkish First Lady.

On the instructions of Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar, the FIA last Saturday sent a questionnaire to Mr Gilani, inquiring about the necklace.

Mr Gilani is not happy with the FIA inquiry. He says the controversy should have ended when he had told the government that the piece of jewellery was with him.

He accuses the PML-N government, especially the interior minister, of his “character assassination” and “media trial” over the matter.

Published in Dawn June 26th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Quid pro quo
Updated 26 Jul, 2026

Quid pro quo

Accepting Israel would mean legitimising its violence against the Palestinians, as well as its neighbouring Arab states and Iran.
AI in government
26 Jul, 2026

AI in government

THE Prime Minister’s Office has announced the introduction of an AI-powered digital system and directed ministries...
Cautious optimism
26 Jul, 2026

Cautious optimism

THE latest polio surveillance figures offer some encouraging news regarding the difficult fight against polio. The...
Rampant lawlessness
Updated 25 Jul, 2026

Rampant lawlessness

THE brutal slaying of a judge and his guard in Mastung is the latest in a series of blood-drenched events that have...
Daily fuel pricing
25 Jul, 2026

Daily fuel pricing

THE government’s move to daily petroleum price adjustments should make fuel pricing more transparent and more...
The drug problem
25 Jul, 2026

The drug problem

WHILE Islamabad Police chase low-level peddlers, the capital’s kingpins have quietly taken their operations ...