Canadian govt urged to relax visa restrictions for Pak military personnel

Published May 30, 2015
Pakistani military personnel have been denied visas since 2007 because of Clause 34 (1) of the Canadian Immigration Act.—White Star/File
Pakistani military personnel have been denied visas since 2007 because of Clause 34 (1) of the Canadian Immigration Act.—White Star/File

ISLAMABAD: The Defence Ministry asked the Canadian government on Friday to relax visa restrictions on Pakistani military personnel intending to travel to Canada.

The issue was raised by Defence Secretary retired Lt Gen Alam Khattak during a meeting with Canadian High Commissioner Heather Cruden.

Ms Cruden, who has recently taken up the Islamabad posting, was visiting the Defence Ministry for a discussion on bilateral military cooperation.

Pakistani military personnel have been denied visas for Canada since 2007 because of Clause 34 (1) of the Canadian Immigration Act.

The inadmissibility clause has been in force in Canada since 2001 and is not Pakistan specific. It disallows entry to individual and members of organisations, who are considered by the Canadian government to have been involved in use of force, pose threat to Canadian security, espionage or subversion of a democratic government.

The Defence Ministry believes that the law has been unduly used to refuse visas to Pakistani military personnel.

A Pakistani diplomat, while explaining seriousness of the problem, said that restrictions were a big issue.

The two sides have been considering a bilateral MoU on Military Training and Cooperation Programme. Pakistan wants the agreement to be finalised so that the two countries could start what an official described as “meaningful cooperation” between the militaries of the two countries.

Secretary Khattak, while talking to the Canadian envoy, emphasised on exploring future prospects of military collaboration between Pakistan and Canada in training of armed forces’ personnel and exchange of visits.

Ms Cruden, according to a Defence Ministry statement, agreed that such exchanges were possible under the Canadian Military Training Assistance Programme.

Published in Dawn, May 30th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...