Release of Clinton’s emails stirs controversy

Published May 23, 2015
The US State Department released on Friday 296 emails from former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton,.—AFP/File
The US State Department released on Friday 296 emails from former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton,.—AFP/File

WASHINGTON: The US State Department released on Friday 296 emails from former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, showing that she did use her private account for receiving information about the 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya.

These are only a tiny proportion of more than 55,000 pages Mrs Clinton turned over to the State Department since leaving office. The State Department intended to release all the documents in January 2016 but last week a Washington court ordered them to release some this week and also issue a timeframe for future releases.

Take a look: US court orders release of Clinton emails

A congressional committee is investigating why Mrs Clinton used her own email account and whether the archive she turned over to the State Department was complete.

The emails released on Friday cover the period from January 2011 through December 2012. They showed that the information she exchanged with her senior aides were not considered classified when released. But parts of at least two emails were later declared “classified” by the US Federal Bureau of Investigation. The State Department redacted those portions while releasing the emails on Friday.

There are 25 memos about Libya from Sidney Blumenthal, a former employee of the Clinton Foundation.

The memos include an assessment of Libyan rebels and their strength and weaknesses.

She forwarded these messages to her aide, Jake J. Sullivan.

Parts of two emails she exchanged with Mr Sullivan were later declared `classified’ by the FBI.

“FBI in Tripoli is fully involved,” he writes to Mrs Clinton. “This could lead to something operationally, or not.”

In another email, Mrs Clinton expresses concern about a statement she had issued on the Sept 11, 2012 attack on the US Consulate in Benghazi.

“You never said spontaneous or characterised the motives, in fact you were careful in your first statement to say we were assessing motive and method,” Mr Sullivan assures her.

“The way you treated the video in the Libya context was to say that some sought to justify the attack on that basis.”

The documents made public on Friday were provided to the House Select Committee on Benghazi several months ago in response to its request for more information about the incident that remains the most troubling moment in Secretary Clinton’s tenure.

Her Republican rivals hope to use the emails to shoot down her 2016 bid for the White House.

Published in Dawn, May 23rd, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...
Privatisation divide
Updated 14 May, 2024

Privatisation divide

How this disagreement within the government will sit with the IMF is anybody’s guess.
AJK protests
14 May, 2024

AJK protests

SINCE last week, Azad Jammu & Kashmir has been roiled by protests, fuelled principally by a disconnect between...
Guns and guards
14 May, 2024

Guns and guards

THERE are some flawed aspects to our society that we must start to fix at the grassroots level. One of these is the...