Nation-state behind internal conflicts

Published February 23, 2015
LAHORE: Romila Thapar and Asma Jahangir at a session ‘Living with Internel Differences: The South Asian dilemma’ at Hall-1. — White Star
LAHORE: Romila Thapar and Asma Jahangir at a session ‘Living with Internel Differences: The South Asian dilemma’ at Hall-1. — White Star

The session titled “Living with internal differences: The South Asian dilemma” on the concluding day of the Lahore Literary Festival on Sunday focused on colonial ‘hangover’, lack of vibrant civil society mechanism and historiographical distortions.

Khaled Ahmed, political analyst and columnist, introduced panelists Romila Thapar, Ayesha Jalal and Asma Jehangir as three extraordinary women of the subcontinent.

Mr Ahmed invited Romila Thapar, a distinguished Indian historian, to comment on the internal differences.

Ms Thapar said the nation-state concept in the subcontinental context transformed internal differences into conflicts. She said the concept had given a major setback to pluralism in the region. “Democracy and secularism are the solutions to the imbalance.”

To a question about problems being faced by historians in India, Thapar said history books were compiled by state institutions and religious organisations. The historian said a chapter on vedic culture in which she after a thorough research had written that Aryans ate beef, was expunged from school textbooks.

“I questioned whether the changes are an attempt to replace mainstream history with a Hindutva version of it.”

Ayesha Jalal, a celebrated historian, said Pakistan didn’t create vibrant civil society organisations as a result of which internal differences extensively weakened society.

Human rights activist Asma Jahangir agreed with Thapar that pluralism strengthened society.

To a question, Ms Jahangir said ‘biased’ legislation aggravated the state of affairs. “I think some colonial-era laws were better. It’s worrisome what the Council of Islamic Ideology is doing. We don’t want politicised legacies.”

She was also critical of new legal paradigm for tackling the spectre of terrorism.

She pointed out that the Constitution of Pakistan negated the concept of equality, citing pre-requisite for head of state.

Digressing for a moment, Khaled Ahmed sought Asma’s comment on Hudood ordinances, to which she said the situation had considerably improved as the number of women languishing in jail reduced.

Ahmed ended the session, citing Romila Thapar: “People want definitive answer from a historian but it is difficult as tomorrow I can say I have more evidence and can change my version.”

Published in Dawn February 23rd , 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Dangerous law
Updated 17 May, 2024

Dangerous law

It must remember that the same law can be weaponised against it one day, just as Peca was when the PTI took power.
Uncalled for pressure
17 May, 2024

Uncalled for pressure

THE recent press conferences by Senators Faisal Vawda and Talal Chaudhry, where they demanded evidence from judges...
KP tussle
17 May, 2024

KP tussle

THE growing war of words between KP Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur and Governor Faisal Karim Kundi is affecting...
Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...