SC tells govt to appoint permanent CEC within two weeks

Published October 14, 2014
A paramilitary soldier and policemen guard outside the Supreme Court building in Islamabad. — Photo by Reuters
A paramilitary soldier and policemen guard outside the Supreme Court building in Islamabad. — Photo by Reuters

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the government to appoint a permanent Chief Election Commissioner within two weeks' time, warning that it would recall its judge temporarily serving on the post if the appointment is not made by Oct 28.

The order was passed by a three-member-bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice Nasirul Mulk during a hearing of the case regarding holding of local bodies' elections.

During the hearing, the court said it was been affected since one of its judges was performing constitutional duties in addition to his designated role.

The court also asked Attorney General Salman Aslam Butt as to when the government would appoint a permanent Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and asked for a time frame in this regard.

The attorney general sought a 30-day period from the court for the appointment but the court only granted time until October 28.

The chief justice giving his remarks said that the court would recall its judge – acting CEC Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali –if the government fails to make the permanent appointment within the stipulated time.

During the hearing, the bench also rejected the reply of the Sindh government regarding delimitation of constituencies in the province.

The court directed the provincial government to present a bill about delimitation of constituencies by Thursday.

It said that the Sindh chief minister will be summoned if the provincial government fails to bring legislation on delimitation of constituencies by the given time.

Meanwhile, the Punjab government in its reply to the Supreme Court over the holding of local bodies’ elections said that legislation from the federal government was required first to authorise the election commission to delimit new constituencies in the province.

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...