WITH the groundbreaking of what is intended to be Pakistan’s largest civilian nuclear power facility by the prime minister in Karachi last week, a practical step has been taken to help meet this country’s ravenous power demand through nuclear technology. Plans for the plant, located on the Karachi coast and expected to produce 2,200MW, have been on the drawing board since the Musharraf era. However, the current administration wants nuclear power to have a much bigger profile in the national energy mix: Nawaz Sharif identified six more sites for nuclear power plants, while the government hopes to generate around 40,000MW under the Nuclear Energy Vision 2050. Nuclear power currently adds a little over 700MW to the national grid.

With the power shortfall hitting nearly 4,000MW during the peak summer months, any additional power on the grid is welcome. Pakistan needs a varied, intelligent energy mix and nuclear power can help bridge the shortfall. Nuclear power is much cheaper than energy produced through expensive furnace oil, and together with hydel, thermal and alternative sources appears set, at least in the eyes of the planners, to be a central component in Pakistan’s power generation infrastructure. Yet to translate the stated policy into a reality two major questions need to be answered. Firstly, the Karachi project is estimated to cost around $10bn. Can the government arrange the funds for this and the other nuclear projects? Secondly, while China will build the new units on the Arabian Sea coast, will Beijing step in to help build the other proposed plants? After all, due to Nuclear Suppliers’ Group restrictions Pakistan has few options but to turn to China. Or has the government made alternative plans?

Environmental and safety concerns are just as important as the logistics of the new nuclear plants. While Pakistan has a good record where nuclear safety is concerned, more transparency and public debate is needed before the plants are built. Proper environmental assessments need to be carried out to ensure the plants are not located in seismic zones or near population centres. These concerns are all the more important in the aftermath of 2011’s Fukushima disaster in Japan. For example, some coastal communities in Karachi have expressed apprehensions about new nuclear power plants in the area. Such public concerns must be satisfactorily addressed by the state. Diversification of the energy mix is essential and nuclear energy is a viable option, as long as safeguards are in place before Pakistan jumps on the nuclear energy bandwagon.

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...