CJ will not hear Musharraf bail case

Published
14

ISLAMABAD: Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry has recused himself from the bench hearing an appeal against post-arrest bail granted to retired General Pervez Musharraf by the Islamabad High Court (IHC) in a case relating to detention of judges after the proclamation of emergency on Nov 3, 2007.

“I shall not hear the plea for cancelling the bail granted by the high court,” the chief justice said on Monday and directed the Supreme Court’s office to send the case filed by advocate Aslam Ghumman to another bench.

The court office had placed the appeal before a bench headed by the chief justice who had also remained in detention until his reinstatement in March 2009.

On June 11, the IHC had granted bail to the former president on a surety bond of Rs500,000. A division bench of the high court held that there was no record to determine Mr Musharraf’s role in placing over 60 judges in detention.

Mr Ghumman filed the petition in the apex court, challenging the IHC’s order of granting bail to Mr Musharraf after removing terrorism from the charge-sheet and requesting the apex court to set aside the decision and order his arrest.

He argued that the IHC order was illegal, unjust and arbitrary and had resulted in grave miscarriage of justice because the high court had not followed the dictum of the Supreme Court in its true prospective.

“The judges of the high court could not delete section 7 of the ATA (Anti- Terrorism Act) while deciding the petition for bail after arrest,” he pleaded and said the deletion had prejudiced his case against Mr Musharraf.

On Aug 11, 2009, it may be mentioned, Mr Ghumman had lodged an FIR with the Secretariat police in Islamabad against Musharraf, accusing him of illegally detaining 60 judges after proclaiming emergency.

The judges along with their families were kept under unlawful confinement and restrained from performing their duties, he said in the FIR.

He alleged that the immoral and illegal act of Mr Musharraf had destroyed the judicial system and caused mental torture to lawyers and people.

“The dictator’s act defamed the country in the eyes of international community,” he said.

Opinion

Editorial

Parliament’s place
Updated 11 Oct, 2026

Parliament’s place

In 2015, the parliament had decided to “maintain neutrality in the Yemen conflict so as to be able to play a proactive diplomatic role to end the crisis”.
Disturbing the peace
11 Oct, 2026

Disturbing the peace

THIS year’s Nobel Peace Prize is well-earned. The winner, South African jurist Dr Navi Pillay, has had an...
A voice in care
10 Oct, 2026

A voice in care

WORLD Mental Health Day this year carries a compelling message. The theme, ‘Lived experiences heard: real voices,...
Midterm break
Updated 10 Oct, 2026

Midterm break

Both the US and Israel need to halt their destructive misadventures in the Middle East.
American barbarism
Updated 10 Oct, 2026

American barbarism

WITH the spectre of defeat in the upcoming midterm elections looming large over the Trump administration, the...