An Apple retail store is seen in Carlsbad, California April 6, 2012. — Reuters Photo
BRUSSELS, May 06, 2013 - EU anti-trust officials said Monday that Google-owned Motorola was abusing its leading position in Germany's mobile phones market by filing a patent injunction against Apple over certain core smartphone functions.
A statement said that the European Union had reached a “preliminary view” on a competition investigation opened in April 2012 and decided that Motorola Mobility's action “amounts to an abuse of a dominant position prohibited by EU anti-trust rules.”
The Commission spelt out that “while recourse to injunctions is a possible remedy for patent infringements, such conduct may be abusive where standard-essential patents (SEPs) are concerned and the potential licensee is willing to enter into a license on Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory (so-called “FRAND”) terms.”
EU Competition Commissioner Joaquin Almunia said: “The protection of intellectual property is a cornerstone of innovation and growth. But so is competition. I think that companies should spend their time innovating and competing on the merits of the products they offer - not misusing their intellectual property rights to hold up competitors to the detriment of innovation and consumer choice.”
In April 2013, the US International Trade Commission tossed out a Motorola Mobility patent claim that threatened to block the import of some Apple iPhone models into the United States. Motorola had accused Apple of infringing on patented technology that makes touch screens ignore fingers when people are holding smartphones to their ears for calls.
Also in April 2013, Germany's patent court invalidated a patent held by Apple -- and contested by rivals Motorola and Samsung - on its “slide to unlock” function for smartphones, concluding that the horizontal swiping gesture was not a technical innovation in itself and therefore did not meet requirements of European patent law.
The aim of the function was to make it easier for users to unlock their smartphone and not solve a specific technical problem, the court said.