Last week I published an article addressing the retired cricket star Imran Khan’s recent surge in popularity as an alternative to Pakistan’s discredited established politicians. The article elicited many more online comments than anything else I’ve written, which is a tribute not to me but to the urgency many Pakistanis feel about the topic, which is not really Imran Khan himself but the yawning chasm of national hopelessness that he aims to fill.

Nearly as striking to me was how many commentrs scolded me for having compared Imran to Obama. I hadn’t even mentioned Obama by name. What I had written was:

Relying on a single charismatic leader to change everything for the better is a setup for embittered disappointment and disillusion. Pakistanis and Americans are very similar, not least in being idealistic; and I’m sorry to have to remind you and myself of how much hope we Americans put in a charismatic figure who promised definitive change here, four long years ago.

As far as I can tell, the readers who scolded me had no real reasons to offer for why Imran and Obama have nothing in common, only wishful assertions. But wishing doesn’t make it so.

There might well be real differences in the personal character and mettle of the two men.

I think there are, in fact, and those favor Imran. He has been toughing it out in the political wilderness for more than 15 years, through many changes of circumstance and regime, when he really didn’t have to. He has earned his credibility the hard way, above all through his tireless and successful work building and funding the justly famous Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital in Lahore. Obama had accomplished nothing comparable to that before becoming President of the United States, and he still hasn’t.

But what the commenters failed – willfully, I would venture, if understandably – to appreciate is that I wasn’t comparing the men, but the phenomena. The questions both raise are: Why do desperate societies feel a need to invest their hopes in a single charismatic would-be leader? What is the best result we can hope for, when that happens? What are the dangers? If (more likely when) the leader disappoints us, is that his or her failure, or our own? Above all, what are we entitled to hope for?

I write these days under two rubrics: twice monthly on Fridays in Dawn on topics directly to do with Pakistan, and every Monday on my own website (excerpted in Dawn) in a series called Home Free, which will also be the title of the book I’m working toward, reporting from the grassroots and commenting on the current and coming crisis here in the USA. Sometimes it’s hard for me to see the line where one ends and the other begins, and indeed one of my standing aspirations is that anything I write should, ideally, speak in some way to anyone who reads English, anywhere in the world. This installment is a case in point.

So these musings are prompted in part by what I see as the dangerous over-investment of hope many Pakistanis are placing in Imran Khan. Expecting too much from him is not fair to him or good for the Pakistani nation and society. At the same time, what’s been on my mind is how the Republican presidential primaries have been dominating mainstream news coverage in the US for far too long now. What that shows is not only the infamously interminable quality of American elections in general, or even Obama’s all too real failure either to be the leader we elected him to be or to assert himself politically.

Beyond proximate contexts and personalities, what I’m sensing is a greater than usual disconnect between the ostensible and the actual, as American society atavistically clings to the vestiges of its formerly functional institutions.

A litany of these reads like a roll call of the institutions that defined the America I grew up in, from once-prestigious book publishers and record companies to General Motors to the nightly news to Hollywood to Schlitz, the beer that made Milwaukee famous. The truth we’re disinclined to face in our national politics is that not only have the Republican and Democratic parties become similarly vestigial and pointless, but maybe so has the presidency itself. What’s been lost along with all of the above is something intangible but that, now that it’s gone, we know to have been crucial. Call it community or share purpose, or at least a tacit agreement that we’re all on the same page. Also lost is a sense that we’re all in the same boat, traveling together to a destination that we believe to be worth the journey.

Read full article here.

Ethan Casey is the author of Alive and Well in Pakistan and Overtaken By Events: A Pakistan Road Trip. He can be reached at www.facebook.com/ethancaseyfans and www.ethancasey.com

The views expressed by this blogger and in the following reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Dawn Media Group.

More From This Section

Celebrities in Indian politics: The dance of democracy

The 2014 Indian Elections happen to feature a record number of Bollywood celebrities contesting across parties.

When Manmohan Singh went AWOL

Given the current situation, would it surprise anybody that the Indian PM wanted to seek spiritual solace?

Who will be Afghanistan's new president?

A look at the three favourite hopefuls and the promises they have made to the people of Afghanistan.

Old politics, young Afghanistan

Coming at a very critical juncture for the country, the Afghan polls mean much more than just selecting a new president.


Comments are closed.

Comments (7)

Amjad Wyne
January 30, 2012 7:45 pm
Imran Khan may get Pakistan out of, "only my family for the leadership" to "any Pakistani for the leadership". These may not be huge changes but these were/are badly needed changes. You are correct in suggesting that Imran alone may not be able to change the system but the nation cannot begin the process without removing the guardian families of these systems.
A Rashid
January 30, 2012 10:59 pm
Obama and Imran comparison is absolutely misplaced. Imran had only been a star cricket player and that is it. He is chasing a shadow by trying to achieve a carrier in politics which clearly is not his cup of tea. Barack Obama is an exceptionally brilliant politician and a great statesman to figure out as one of the stars of the century.
Cyrus Howell
April 25, 2012 4:42 pm
Name recognition is a very important part of running for political office - win or lose.
Cyrus Howell
April 25, 2012 4:39 pm
Obama was president of the Harvard Law Review at university. He then was "a community organizer" in Chicago helping people to agree on changes, and bringing together the Black, White and Mexican community (on the Southeast side) and the city council. I would say that is good experience and not a bad background for a president.
Tariq K Sami
May 21, 2012 10:14 pm
My fear is that Imran may be killed. Remember what happened to Bobby Kennedy. And then the world will have to wait a hundred years.
Cyrus Howell
May 22, 2012 12:54 am
Pakistan does not need intellectuals armed with Ph.Ds. It needs intellectuals armed with assault rifles and bayonets. National politics isn't cricket, and the bad guys are good with guns not bats.
Cyrus Howell
May 22, 2012 12:58 am
We are Not "entitled" to just hope. People must take action, Nothing is free but the Grace of God.
Explore: Indian elections 2014
Explore: Indian elections 2014
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
Bloggers
Tweets