Information Minister Marriyum Aurangzeb on Friday said that the decision not to air Prime Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi's "press talk" on Monday ─ which had followed a National Security Committee (NSC) meeting triggered by a statement made by Nawaz Sharif in an interview published in Dawn ─ was hers.

Nawaz, while speaking during the interview on matters related to the country’s foreign policy, had stated: "Militant organisations are active. Call them non-state actors, should we allow them to cross the border and kill 150 people in Mumbai? Explain it to me. Why can’t we complete the trial?"

The remarks — made in reference to the 2008 Mumbai attacks — had drawn controversy after they were played up in Indian media as an 'admission' by a thrice-elected prime minister of Pakistan's complicity in the tragedy.

Read more: 'Nawaz will soften his rhetoric', Shahbaz assures concerned PML-N lawmakers

The NSC meeting, called by PM Abbasi on the 'suggestion' of the military's senior command to address the matter, had deemed "the recent statement in the context of Mumbai attacks, as it appeared in the Daily Dawn of 12th May 2018 [...] as incorrect and misleading."

"The participants observed that it was very unfortunate that the opinion arising out of either misconceptions or grievances was being presented in disregard of concrete facts and realities. The participants unanimously rejected the allegations and condemned the fallacious assertions."

PM Abbasi, in what was believed at the time to be a regular press conference following the NSC meeting, had stated that Nawaz's remarks were being misrepresented by Indian media, and that people in Pakistan should not become party to the propaganda.

The prime minister's remarks, however, were not aired on any television channel at the time ─ an unusual move as it caught media outlets off-guard when they were eventually reported by the journalists invited to the 'press talk'.

The information minister today, in response to a query regarding why electronic media had not broadcast the prime minister's press conference, explained that it was "never a press conference, but a press talk".

She also said the "interaction with journalists who were invited to Prime Minister House [...] was not to be telecast live".

She added that "cameras were not allowed inside" the premises.

"It was my decision," she added.

When asked if she wanted to comment on rumours that the footage of Abbasi's "press talk" had been deleted from PTV's archives or stopped from airing, she said that if the reports were true, she would have addressed them.

"The media kept airing these rumours for three days, and I thought, 'Let it go'," she said. "If [the media] had asked, I would have given a clarification."

Read more: 'PTV will continue to broadcast Nawaz, Maryam's speeches live even if they speak for 5 hours'

Curiously, Aurangzeb, who came under fire during a Senate standing committee meeting earlier this week over PTV's allocation of sizeable airtime to Nawaz Sharif and his daughter Maryam Nawaz, had defended her actions saying: "Nawaz Sharif is a national leader; he has been the prime minister three times. If he and Maryam Nawaz speak for even five hours [at a stretch], we will broadcast it live."

Opinion

Editorial

Under siege
Updated 03 May, 2024

Under siege

Whether through direct censorship, withholding advertising, harassment or violence, the press in Pakistan navigates a hazardous terrain.
Meddlesome ways
03 May, 2024

Meddlesome ways

AFTER this week’s proceedings in the so-called ‘meddling case’, it appears that the majority of judges...
Mass transit mess
03 May, 2024

Mass transit mess

THAT Karachi — one of the world’s largest megacities — does not have a mass transit system worth the name is ...
Punishing evaders
02 May, 2024

Punishing evaders

THE FBR’s decision to block mobile phone connections of more than half a million individuals who did not file...
Engaging Riyadh
Updated 02 May, 2024

Engaging Riyadh

It must be stressed that to pull in maximum foreign investment, a climate of domestic political stability is crucial.
Freedom to question
02 May, 2024

Freedom to question

WITH frequently suspended freedoms, increasing violence and few to speak out for the oppressed, it is unlikely that...