Women judges’ quota

Published November 9, 2016

AFFIRMATIVE action, for all its merits in addressing systemic imbalances based on gender, ethnicity, etc cannot be justified in all situations. That realisation, it would appear, rightly clinched the debate on Monday in a meeting of the National Assembly’s Standing Committee on Law and Justice to examine the Islamabad High Court Act (Amendment) Bill 2016. Introduced by the MQM’s Nikhat Shakeel Khan, the bill proposed that a quota be instituted for women to be appointed judges in the Islamabad High Court. Aside from one, all the other committee members, including women legislators elected to the National Assembly on reserved seats, rejected the proposed amendment, asserting that appointments to the bench be made strictly on merit. It was also pointed out that there existed no precedent anywhere in the world for such a practice.

It may be tempting to draw parallels between the reserved seats for women in the legislatures and the suggested quota for women judges — particularly so given the objections to the proposal by female lawmakers elected on a quota — but such a comparison does not jibe with logic. Considered dispassionately, it is also frivolous. As vital as the job of legislators is to a functioning democracy, it is not a profession that demands the specialised skills required of members of the judiciary. Moreover, in professions such as law, medicine, etc where decisions can have a direct bearing on the lives of individuals, merit alone should be the touchstone of decisions about promotions. However, the lopsided gender balance in the legal profession as a whole is certainly a matter of concern. One way to address it is to institute affirmative action at the level of law colleges/universities with a quota for female applicants in order to bring more women into the legal fraternity. But for that to pay real dividends, it should go hand in hand with efforts to clean up the rough-and-tumble environment in the country’s courts which also deters many female lawyers from going into litigation practice. There must be more initiatives along the lines of the committee set up by Lahore High Court Chief Justice Mansoor Ali Shah to look into matters relating to women judicial officers, including the hostile and boorish behaviour sometimes directed at them by lawyers and litigants alike. Bringing gender equality to the bench and bar is much required, and deserves more attention from the legal fraternity than it has so far given to it.

Published in Dawn November 9th, 2016

Opinion

The Dar story continues

The Dar story continues

One wonders what the rationale was for the foreign minister — a highly demanding, full-time job — being assigned various other political responsibilities.

Editorial

Wheat protests
Updated 01 May, 2024

Wheat protests

The government should withdraw from the wheat trade gradually, replacing the existing market support mechanism with an effective new one over the next several years.
Polio drive
01 May, 2024

Polio drive

THE year’s fourth polio drive has kicked off across Pakistan, with the aim to immunise more than 24m children ...
Workers’ struggle
Updated 01 May, 2024

Workers’ struggle

Yet the struggle to secure a living wage — and decent working conditions — for the toiling masses must continue.
All this talk
Updated 30 Apr, 2024

All this talk

The other parties are equally legitimate stakeholders in the country’s political future, and it must give them due consideration.
Monetary policy
30 Apr, 2024

Monetary policy

ALIGNING its decision with the trend in developed economies, the State Bank has acted wisely by holding its key...
Meaningless appointment
30 Apr, 2024

Meaningless appointment

THE PML-N’s policy of ‘family first’ has once again triggered criticism. The party’s latest move in this...