NA-122 decision

Published September 2, 2015

ELECTION Tribunal Judge Kazim Ali Malik announced his decision in the case of NA-122, de-seating Sirdar Ayaz Sadiq. This has triggered a lot of discussion as expected on TV talk shows.

What is surprising is that PML-N ministers in the federal and Punjab cabinets have started directly accusing the judge, declaring the judgement as well as the judge to be biased.

Rana Sanaullah has even accused him of carrying a grudge against his party for long and that the judge wanted a ticket for his son for contesting an election on the platform of the party from Khushab.

It appears to be a simple case of contempt of court since a tribunal also carries the same status as that of a court.

The PML-N has the option to challenge the decision of the tribunal in the Supreme Court. They should not have given such statements.

Abdul Qayum Khan

Bahrain

Published in Dawn, September 2nd, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Under siege
Updated 03 May, 2024

Under siege

Whether through direct censorship, withholding advertising, harassment or violence, the press in Pakistan navigates a hazardous terrain.
Meddlesome ways
03 May, 2024

Meddlesome ways

AFTER this week’s proceedings in the so-called ‘meddling case’, it appears that the majority of judges...
Mass transit mess
03 May, 2024

Mass transit mess

THAT Karachi — one of the world’s largest megacities — does not have a mass transit system worth the name is ...
Punishing evaders
02 May, 2024

Punishing evaders

THE FBR’s decision to block mobile phone connections of more than half a million individuals who did not file...
Engaging Riyadh
Updated 02 May, 2024

Engaging Riyadh

It must be stressed that to pull in maximum foreign investment, a climate of domestic political stability is crucial.
Freedom to question
02 May, 2024

Freedom to question

WITH frequently suspended freedoms, increasing violence and few to speak out for the oppressed, it is unlikely that...