SC unseats PML-N’s Omar Ayub

Published June 20, 2015
A three-judge bench had taken up a review petition moved by PTI candidate Dr Raja Aamer Zaman against the court’s March 7, 2014 judgement. — APP/File
A three-judge bench had taken up a review petition moved by PTI candidate Dr Raja Aamer Zaman against the court’s March 7, 2014 judgement. — APP/File

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Friday unseated PML-N’s Omar Ayub Khan from the National Assembly constituency NA-19 Haripur in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and ordered the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) to hold a by-election there.

A three-judge bench, headed by Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja and consisting of Justice Gulzar Ahmed and Justice Sheikh Azmat Saeed, had taken up a review petition moved by PTI candidate Dr Raja Aamer Zaman against the court’s March 7, 2014 judgement. The decision was a two-to-one verdict, with Justice Saeed dissenting. The main judgement was authored by Justice Khawaja.

Dr Raja Zaman was declared the returned candidate during the 2013 general elections from the NA-19 constituency after securing 116,979 votes against Mr Ayub’s 114,807. A recount was ordered, but Dr Zaman remained the successful candidate, though his original victory margin of 2,172 was reduced to 1,304.

Consequently, Mr Ayub challenged the result before an election tribunal, which, in its judgement on Dec 31, 2013, ordered re-polling in seven stations instead of declaring the election void.

The tribunal’s order was challenged by Dr Zaman before the apex court, which dismissed the same. Consequently, he filed a review petition against the judgement, which was accepted and his opponent was de-seated.

In the judgement, Justice Khawaja observed that the elections in NA-19 Haripur stood vitiated and contaminated when it became evident that voting at the seven polling stations had materially affected the outcome of the election.

Thus, the prejudice towards Dr Zaman is evident, the judgment said, adding that the failure to properly apply election laws would also be, by definition, prejudicial not only to the petitioner but also to the entire constituency because they would not be able to elect a parliamentarian in the by-election.

Therefore, the ECP will hold a by-election for the constituency in accordance with the law, the judgement stated.

Meanwhile, in his note of dissent, Justice Saeed observed that in the eventuality of a failure to comply with the mandatory provisions of the Representation of Peoples Act (RoPA), 1976, and elections rules, the election tribunal may declare the entire election as void in exercise of powers under Section 70 of RoPA. But at the same time, it cannot be deprived of the jurisdiction to grant partial relief by declaring the election at a few polling stations void and directing a re-poll there.

Published in Dawn June 20th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Ties with Tehran
Updated 24 Apr, 2024

Ties with Tehran

Tomorrow, if ties between Washington and Beijing nosedive, and the US asks Pakistan to reconsider CPEC, will we comply?
Working together
24 Apr, 2024

Working together

PAKISTAN’S democracy seems adrift, and no one understands this better than our politicians. The system has gone...
Farmers’ anxiety
24 Apr, 2024

Farmers’ anxiety

WHEAT prices in Punjab have plummeted far below the minimum support price owing to a bumper harvest, reckless...
By-election trends
Updated 23 Apr, 2024

By-election trends

Unless the culture of violence and rigging is rooted out, the credibility of the electoral process in Pakistan will continue to remain under a cloud.
Privatising PIA
23 Apr, 2024

Privatising PIA

FINANCE Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb’s reaffirmation that the process of disinvestment of the loss-making national...
Suffering in captivity
23 Apr, 2024

Suffering in captivity

YET another animal — a lioness — is critically ill at the Karachi Zoo. The feline, emaciated and barely able to...