Development priorities

Published June 3, 2015
Why is ‘security-related expenditure’ being budgeted in the development plan for next year? —Courtesy: PM House
Why is ‘security-related expenditure’ being budgeted in the development plan for next year? —Courtesy: PM House

THE new development budget for the next fiscal year shows some skewed priorities at play.

Irrigation projects have been reduced, as have health and education, under the argument that these are now provincial responsibilities.

Outlays on roads have been increased, and there is a mammoth Rs100bn hike in spending on IDP repatriation and “related security expenditure”.

Also read: 5.5pc GDP growth target approved for fiscal year 2015-16

Additionally, Rs20bn have been allocated for the prime minister’s miscellaneous youth-related initiatives, such as laptop distribution. This is a little puzzling and some questions necessarily arise.

Why is ‘security-related expenditure’ being budgeted in the development plan for next year? And how does the bill for IDP repatriation add up to Rs100bn, especially considering the announcements that repatriation may be delayed further?

And why do the prime minister’s youth-related initiatives merit Rs20bn while other vital programmes such as health and education are brushed off to the provinces?

Roads are useful infrastructure projects, but why is railway not being touted as a bigger priority if communications are important? Water-related infrastructure at a time of climate change and repeated annual flooding must go beyond just the lining of water courses and building dams. It must include appropriate flood warning and control infrastructure as well, which should be retained as a federal priority, but it seems as if the government is not interested in pursuing these.

The development plan appears to reflect the government’s preference for high-visibility infrastructure projects and schemes to distribute goodies instead of investing in social service delivery.

The extraordinary allocation for ‘security-related expenditure’ also raises serious questions about whether or not this belongs in a development plan or if it should be met through current expenditure instead.

If the government is getting ready to tell us that this is its plan for lifting the growth rate up to 5.5pc for next year, we can only say that it is likely to be met with scepticism. We hope that the budget itself will reflect more coherent thinking.

Published in Dawn, June 3rd, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

The Dar story continues

The Dar story continues

One wonders what the rationale was for the foreign minister — a highly demanding, full-time job — being assigned various other political responsibilities.

Editorial

Wheat protests
Updated 01 May, 2024

Wheat protests

The government should withdraw from the wheat trade gradually, replacing the existing market support mechanism with an effective new one over the next several years.
Polio drive
01 May, 2024

Polio drive

THE year’s fourth polio drive has kicked off across Pakistan, with the aim to immunise more than 24m children ...
Workers’ struggle
Updated 01 May, 2024

Workers’ struggle

Yet the struggle to secure a living wage — and decent working conditions — for the toiling masses must continue.
All this talk
Updated 30 Apr, 2024

All this talk

The other parties are equally legitimate stakeholders in the country’s political future, and it must give them due consideration.
Monetary policy
30 Apr, 2024

Monetary policy

ALIGNING its decision with the trend in developed economies, the State Bank has acted wisely by holding its key...
Meaningless appointment
30 Apr, 2024

Meaningless appointment

THE PML-N’s policy of ‘family first’ has once again triggered criticism. The party’s latest move in this...