SC allows govt to resubmit amended appeal against IHC verdict on Qadri plea

Published April 21, 2015
“The high court judgment has raised many legal questions like should the culprit be booked under terrorism laws for murdering the governor of a province,” Justice Khan observed while postponing the proceedings to May 14. — Online/file
“The high court judgment has raised many legal questions like should the culprit be booked under terrorism laws for murdering the governor of a province,” Justice Khan observed while postponing the proceedings to May 14. — Online/file

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court allowed the federal government on Monday to resubmit an amended appeal against the March 9 judgment of the Islamabad High Court accepting Mumtaz Qadri’s plea to annul a provision of the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA).

A two-judge SC bench headed by Justice Dost Mohammad Khan decided to jointly take up the appeals of the federal government as well as Mumtaz Qadri, who has been sentenced to death for killing former Punjab governor Salman Taseer in Islamabad on Jan 4, 2011.

“The high court judgment has raised many legal questions like should the culprit be booked under terrorism laws for murdering the governor of a province,” Justice Khan observed while postponing the proceedings to May 14.

The IHC had dismissed Qadri’s petition against the award of death sentence under the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC), but accepted his application to declare Section 7 of the ATA void. The section provides for punishment of death for committing acts of terrorism.

The high court had observed that none of the prosecution witnesses, except one, and neither the investigating officer nor the prosecution evidence suggested that Qadri’s act amounted to an attempt to create panic, to intimidate and terrorise the public, or to create a sense of fear and insecurity among the public.

Qadri later filed an appeal in the apex court against the IHC verdict through his counsel Mian Nazeer Akhtar. It contended that the case did not fall under Section 302 of the PPC which envisaged capital punishment for intention to murder; rather Section 302(b) which deals with punishment for life imprisonment should have been applied.

Lahore High Court’s former chief justice Khawaja Mohammad Sharif, who is defending Qadri voluntarily, had told reporters that the award of death sentence was not in accordance with law and the Constitution because the murder was caused by provocation.

The government’s application filed through the interior ministry had challenged the high court’s order of omitting the ATA’s Section 7.

On April 8, the interior ministry moved an application requesting the Supreme Court to give it one week to file a proper appeal, along with paper books, because a 30-day period for moving appeals against the judgment was approaching.

The court asked the government to submit a proper petition so that it could be taken up, along with the appeal of Qadri, on May 14.

Published in Dawn, April 21st, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Editorial

Ominous demands
Updated 18 May, 2024

Ominous demands

The federal government needs to boost its revenues to reduce future borrowing and pay back its existing debt.
Property leaks
18 May, 2024

Property leaks

THE leaked Dubai property data reported on by media organisations around the world earlier this week seems to have...
Heat warnings
18 May, 2024

Heat warnings

STARTING next week, the country must brace for brutal heatwaves. The NDMA warns of severe conditions with...
Dangerous law
Updated 17 May, 2024

Dangerous law

It must remember that the same law can be weaponised against it one day, just as Peca was when the PTI took power.
Uncalled for pressure
17 May, 2024

Uncalled for pressure

THE recent press conferences by Senators Faisal Vawda and Talal Chaudhry, where they demanded evidence from judges...
KP tussle
17 May, 2024

KP tussle

THE growing war of words between KP Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur and Governor Faisal Karim Kundi is affecting...