MNAs, media bodies at odds over space for terrorists

Published December 31, 2014
In this photo, Rangers personnel stand guard outside Parliament. — AFP/File
In this photo, Rangers personnel stand guard outside Parliament. — AFP/File

ISLAMABAD: Parliamentarians and representatives of print and electronic media failed on Tuesday to forge a consensus over coverage of terrorists and terrorist activities, with industry experts saying the government apparently wanted to impose restrictions on media organisations in the wake of carnage at a Peshawar school.

A set of suggestions about changes to laws on public disclosures were presented at a meeting of the National Assembly’s Standing Committee on Information, Broadcasting and National Heritage, but most of the proposals were opposed by representatives of the media industry.

The meeting, held in the Parliament House and presided over by Pakistan Muslim League-N MNA Marvi Memon, ended up discussing mostly impractical measures, according to some observers.

At the meeting, the Pakistan Broadcasters Association (PBA) was represented by Dr Basit Riaz, the All Pakistan Newspapers Society (APNS) by Sarmad Ali and the Council of Pakistan Newspaper Editors (CPNE) by Khushnood Ali Khan. Several representatives of the civil society also attended the meeting.

“The committee members either want to shut down all media organisations, including social media outlets, or they are looking for excuses to cover up their failures,” Khushnood Ali Khan of the CPNE told Dawn.

“All of us — the CPNE, PBA and APNS — told the committee that it will be much better to enforce the existing laws instead of trying to impose restrictions on us.

“...The committee’s proposals were too vague and inappropriate”.

Tuesday’s session was the second held by the committee to discuss recommendations for the media and to formulate set of mechanisms to counter the narrative of terrorists.

The committee also discussed proposals to restrict the dissemination of direct and quoted statements about confessions and threats of violence from members of the proscribed organisations.

Though the proposals were supported by members of the committee and the civil society representatives, the media industry experts opposed them.

During the meeting, meanwhile, the media experts as well as lawmakers remained confused over what was meant by “glorification of terrorists”.

It was suggested that monitoring social media outlets fell within the domain of Nacta.

Published in Dawn, December 31st, 2014

Opinion

Editorial

Rigging claims
Updated 04 May, 2024

Rigging claims

The PTI’s allegations are not new; most elections in Pakistan have been controversial, and it is almost a given that results will be challenged by the losing side.
Gaza’s wasteland
04 May, 2024

Gaza’s wasteland

SINCE the start of hostilities on Oct 7, Israel has put in ceaseless efforts to depopulate Gaza, and make the Strip...
Housing scams
04 May, 2024

Housing scams

THE story of illegal housing schemes in Punjab is the story of greed, corruption and plunder. Major players in these...
Under siege
Updated 03 May, 2024

Under siege

Whether through direct censorship, withholding advertising, harassment or violence, the press in Pakistan navigates a hazardous terrain.
Meddlesome ways
03 May, 2024

Meddlesome ways

AFTER this week’s proceedings in the so-called ‘meddling case’, it appears that the majority of judges...
Mass transit mess
03 May, 2024

Mass transit mess

THAT Karachi — one of the world’s largest megacities — does not have a mass transit system worth the name is ...