SC dismisses all petitions seeking PM Nawaz's disqualification

Published December 9, 2014
Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif. - AFP/File photo
Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif. - AFP/File photo

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed all petitions seeking the disqualification of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif.

Three identical petitions had been filed by Pakistan Muslim League - Quaid (PML-Q) chief Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain, Advocate Gauhar Nawaz and Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) leader Ishaq Khakwani which stated that PM Nawaz had lied on the floor of the National Assembly on the issue of arbitration by the army.

Nawaz had told the parliament that it was Pakistan Awami Tehreek (PAT) chief Dr Tahirul Qadri and Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) chairman Imran Khan who had requested a meeting with Army Chief General Raheel Sharif in order to broker a settlement with the government over the political crisis in the country.

Nawaz had said he gave permission for the army chief to engage the two leaders and play the role of a mediator.

However, Imran and Qadri had categorically rejected the premier's statement that they had invoked the army's help, and had slammed the premier for 'lying to the nation'.

The military had later issued a short statement saying that it was playing the role of facilitator in the ongoing political crisis at the behest of the government.

A seven-member larger bench of the apex court, headed by Chief Justice Nasirul Mulk, was hearing the case today.

During the hearing, counsel for Chaudhry Shujaat and Ishaq Khakwani Irfan Qadir contended that PM Nawaz's statement in the Parliament had been denied by the Chief of Army Staff (COAS).

The premier's speech in Parliament was also read out in the court.

The bench observed that the premier had not made a direct reference to the army and had only endorsed the opinion of Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan.

Take a look: Cornered PML-N justifies army involvement in political crisis

The bench noted that Director General Inter Services Public Relations (ISPR) Major Asim Bajwa had not explicitly mentioned the premier’s name in his tweet and had referred to the government asking the army to play a facilitative role for resolution of the political crisis in the country.

The bench said 'government' could suggest any member of the federal cabinet.

The court asked Attorney General Salman Butt whether DG ISPR had held a press conference later where he had mentioned the premier's name. Responding to this, Butt said that the matter had only been confined to Twitter.

The court said it could not order the trial of PM Nawaz under Articles 62 and 63 of the Constitution as there was a Parliament in place, adding that it could only do so if elections were in process.

In the existing situation, it said, the matter had to be forwarded to NA Speaker Ayaz Sadiq and then to the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP), adding that the court was not the right body to be approached on this.

The bench was not satisfied with the petitioners' claims that the PM had lied in the National Assembly. It also said that the petitioners could not seek the premier's disqualification as the matter did not concern them.

The court subsequently ordered the dismissal of all petitions seeking the premier's disqualification.

Opinion

Editorial

Under siege
Updated 03 May, 2024

Under siege

Whether through direct censorship, withholding advertising, harassment or violence, the press in Pakistan navigates a hazardous terrain.
Meddlesome ways
03 May, 2024

Meddlesome ways

AFTER this week’s proceedings in the so-called ‘meddling case’, it appears that the majority of judges...
Mass transit mess
03 May, 2024

Mass transit mess

THAT Karachi — one of the world’s largest megacities — does not have a mass transit system worth the name is ...
Punishing evaders
02 May, 2024

Punishing evaders

THE FBR’s decision to block mobile phone connections of more than half a million individuals who did not file...
Engaging Riyadh
Updated 02 May, 2024

Engaging Riyadh

It must be stressed that to pull in maximum foreign investment, a climate of domestic political stability is crucial.
Freedom to question
02 May, 2024

Freedom to question

WITH frequently suspended freedoms, increasing violence and few to speak out for the oppressed, it is unlikely that...