Talks with the Taliban

Published
24

THE state is talking to the Taliban again — but this time in rather different circumstances.

The last time the government tried to negotiate with the banned TTP, it did so from a position of weakness: the TTP was in the ascendant, the TTP was regularly attacking state and society and the TTP was the one issuing preconditions. Now though, as the government negotiates with a breakaway Mehsud faction of the TTP, there are marked differences.

For one, the military operation in North Waziristan Agency has scattered the TTP and denied it a vital base from which to organise and plot attacks against Pakistan.

For another, the state is attempting a dual track of dialogue and fighting — exactly what should have happened before, given that keeping the pressure on militants could cause them to yield at the negotiating table more quickly and also abide by any agreement reached.

As for the possibility of a negotiated peace with certain sections of the Taliban, the priority of the state should be to ensure the Taliban factions are not simply looking to buy time to regroup, reorganise and, eventually, emerge to challenge the state again. And while there is nothing inherently wrong in seeking to negotiate with any enemy, there need to be certain red lines.

For one, many of the groups that have, over the years, reached a settlement with the state have tended to do so while simultaneously vowing to take their fight outside the territorial boundaries of Pakistan. That usually has meant concentrating on neighbouring Afghanistan in recent times. But that never has been, and certainly is not now, in Pakistan’s overall security interests.

Negotiations must not allow militant groups to continue to exist on Pakistani soil with a mission of destabilising neighbouring countries or even beyond.

At the same time, the Pakistani state should impress on the Afghan government that the problem of reverse sanctuaries — Pakistani militants hiding out in border regions of Afghanistan from where they plot and organise attacks inside Pakistan — cannot be allowed to grow.

Time and again Afghan and Pakistani officials insist that the only way to ensure regional stability and peace is to eliminate all sanctuaries, but then quietly do things — or look the other way in times of crisis — that nudge peace and stability a little further out of reach. Militants are a danger to everyone. Allowing some to survive if they focus elsewhere is not a winning strategy.

Published in Dawn, October 29th , 2014

Opinion

Editorial

Muddled hierarchy
15 Nov, 2026

Muddled hierarchy

THE Federal Constitutional Court marked its first anniversary on Friday with a commemorative stamp. Speaking on the...
Growing crisis
15 Nov, 2026

Growing crisis

AN emergency can be judged by the speed with which it draws an effective response. The National Population Council’s...
Organised rackets
15 Nov, 2026

Organised rackets

ON the International Day against Transnational Organised Crime, observed today, Pakistan finds itself in a tight...
Referendum talk
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Referendum talk

Unless the PPP is deliberately using Sindh as a bargaining chip, it should issue a clarification with a clear, consistent position on new administrative units, not one tailored to protect its home turf.
Mineral wealth
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Mineral wealth

Minerals should not be presented as a solution to Pakistan’s long-term economic difficulties. The aim should be to build an industrial base rather than export raw materials.
Late diagnosis
14 Nov, 2026

Late diagnosis

AS we mark World Diabetes Day today, Pakistan faces a troubling question: how many people are living with diabetes...