WASHINGTON: The United States has firmly put its weight behind the “elected government”, declaring that it did not support any “extra-constitutional chan­ges” in Pakistan or those “attempting to impose” such changes.

At a news briefing in Washing­ton, State Department spokesperson Marie Harf made it clear that the US believed “Nawaz Sharif was elected and is prime minister” and that “there’s a government in place that was elected”.

The statement caused an angry reaction at Islamabad’s D Chowk, where thousands of PTI and PAT workers have been protesting for a week to force the prime minister to resign.

The US statement, however, was not a knee-jerk reaction to the crisis and clearly defined the US position on this issue.

“We support the constitutional and electoral process in Pakistan, which produced the Prime Minister of Nawaz Sharif,” said Ms Harf. “That was a process they followed, an election they had, and we are focused on working with Pakistan.”

In reply to a question about the demand for the prime minister’s resignation, the US official said: “We do not support any extra-constitutional changes to that democratic system or people attempting to impose them.”

“So you’re not calling for Prime Minister Sharif to step down?” asked the journalist.

“I in no way am calling on that,” said Ms Harf.

When another journalist compared Pakistan’s political unrest with the violence in Iraq and suggested that the military may take over the government because of the “grave situation” in Islamabad, she warned him not to do so.

“I’d … caution you from using terms like grave … Nawaz Sharif was elected and is prime minister. There is a government that was elected in place,” she said.

Ms Harf also warned the journalist not to assume that the political unrest would draw in the military.

“And again, I would caution you from assuming, sort of, where this goes from here. We think there’s a path forward here that’s peaceful. We know there’s a lot of space for political dialogue, but it has to remain peaceful,” she said.

Responding to PTI’s claim that since the last elections were rigged, Mr Sharif was not a legitimate prime minister, Ms Harf said: “He’s the prime minister, period.”

Ms Harf also disagreed with the suggestion that the current political crisis had made the country’s nuclear weapons unsafe.

“I would venture to guess that we always care about that issue,” said Ms Harf when a journalist asked if the United States was keeping an eye on those weapons.

Published in Dawn, August 22nd, 2014

Opinion

Editorial

‘Missing’ LGs
29 Jun, 2026

‘Missing’ LGs

Across the world, successful civic governance is made possible through effective, responsive local bodies, which are closest to the voter.
Audit or ritual?
29 Jun, 2026

Audit or ritual?

THE AGP’s latest audit report of federal civil accounts is a detailed record of governance failures and...
Al Aqsa under threat
29 Jun, 2026

Al Aqsa under threat

NOT satisfied with the genocidal violence it has unleashed in Gaza, the current Israeli administration is doing all...
Truce tested
Updated 28 Jun, 2026

Truce tested

The latest US-Iran exchange should therefore be treated not as proof that dialogue has failed, but as a warning of how easily it could.
Paper promises
28 Jun, 2026

Paper promises

WHAT is a UNSC resolution worth if it is never implemented? Pakistan and China felt compelled to convene an informal...
Still the masters
28 Jun, 2026

Still the masters

CRISTIANO Ronaldo and Lionel Messi do not seem to be going away quietly. At least, not yet. The duo might have left...