Sectarian killings

Published July 28, 2014
Family members of a victim of sectarian violence.— File photo
Family members of a victim of sectarian violence.— File photo

ON Friday, participants making their way to the Al Quds Day rally in Karachi were fired upon. And only a couple of days earlier, a lawyer — the son-in-law of a prominent Shia scholar — was targeted on a busy road in the city.

Karachi, beset with various gangs perpetuating their brand of violence, in particular offers little security against those bent upon using their own interpretation of faith to exterminate the ‘other’.

Karachi: Senior lawyer shot dead in ‘sectarian’ attack

There are few that feel secure in this buzzing commercial metropolis, but those who possess names that easily give away their sect are more vulnerable than others. Educated professionals have been frequently hit in this sect-based violence — but those lower down the occupation ladder have not been spared either. In fact, the regular occurrence of sectarian tension — and not only in Karachi — has given it a sense of something permanent.

Once, not too long ago, an incident of sectarian killing anywhere in the country would have various groups of people up in protest and the government vowing to catch and punish the attackers. With time, and amid an increasing number of incidents of sectarian violence, government officials were gradually reduced to offering empty statements of solidarity with the targeted. Now, even this formality has been done away with.

Promises have lost their purpose because nobody believes them now and because they have not been accompanied by a plan of action. A momentary decrease in the acts of targeted killings has the government heaving a sigh of relief, but even when an improvement in the situation is noted, the city and provincial administrations can hardly claim credit. This is so because there are no official plans on the table to combat the menace of sectarianism, not even those typical ones which look good on paper but are extremely hard to implement.

In the past, there would at least be some elementary discussion about the dangers an administration was exposing the people to when it failed to control hate speech. More than occasionally, there would be a call from somewhere for combined efforts towards religious harmony, and if the speaker chose to be more specific, there would be questions asked about the divisive curriculum taught at schools including religious seminaries. If these questions have become infrequent, that is in aid of the government officials who must always look concerned but do nothing. Protest against such killings must be revived.

Published in Dawn, July 28th, 2014

Opinion

In defamation’s name

In defamation’s name

It provides yet more proof that the undergirding logic of public authority in Pakistan is legal and extra-legal coercion rather than legitimised consent.

Editorial

Mercury rising
Updated 27 May, 2024

Mercury rising

Each of the country's leaders is equally responsible for the deep pit Pakistan seems to have fallen into.
Antibiotic overuse
27 May, 2024

Antibiotic overuse

ANTIMICROBIAL resistance is an escalating crisis claiming some 700,000 lives annually in Pakistan. It is the third...
World Cup team
27 May, 2024

World Cup team

PAKISTAN waited until the very end to name their T20 World Cup squad. Even then, there was last-minute drama. Four...
ICJ rebuke
Updated 26 May, 2024

ICJ rebuke

The reason for Israel’s criminal behaviour is that it is protected by its powerful Western friends.
Hot spells
26 May, 2024

Hot spells

WITH Pakistan already dealing with a heatwave that has affected 26 districts since May 21, word from the climate...
Defiant stance
26 May, 2024

Defiant stance

AT a time when the country is in talks with the IMF for a medium-term loan crucial to bolstering the fragile ...