Warning signs ignored

Published March 27, 2014

WHEN terrible events or a devastating episode occurs, there is a tendency here to regard them as utterly unexpected. But, more often than not, the warning signs have been there all along — ignored at our own peril. The New York Times has reported that the US government believes that several Al Qaeda veterans have left the Pak-Afghan border area to go and join the rebels fighting the Assad regime in Syria. In and of itself, the claim is not new or surprising, though many of the details are. One of those details in particular ought to alarm policymakers here, not least because the NYT has referred to it in a matter-of-fact manner. The phrase in question: “Al Qaeda’s senior leadership in Pakistan, including Ayman al-Zawahiri”. Once upon a time, Pakistan used to scoff at and dismiss US claims that Osama bin Laden was hiding inside Pakistan. Then, to Pakistan’s lasting humiliation, bin Laden was indeed found to have been living comfortably inside this country for many years.

The problem is, no lessons appear to have been learned from that debacle. If al-Zawahiri is in Pakistan, what are the authorities here doing to help track him down before the Americans do? For who can, in the wake of the OBL raid, believe that the Americans would hesitate to launch another unilateral raid to take out al-Zawahiri if they track down his exact location and are unsure of whether he is being given protection by elements within the state or not? And what of the aftermath of such an incident? The benefit of doubt seemingly given to Pakistan in 2011 may not be so easily extended in 2014 with the drawdown of foreign forces in Afghanistan a certainty. Inside Pakistan too the rising tide of anti-Americanism may be harder to contain, given the space ceded to militancy of all stripes over the last year in particular. Al Qaeda never has been an ally or friend or even a tolerated non-state actor of Pakistan. It is in Pakistan’s own interest to eliminate the group, especially its leadership, from Pakistani soil. Incompetence or complicity, as was suspected after the OBL episode, is simply not an option anymore — at least if Pakistan wants to be considered a responsible state internationally.

Opinion

Editorial

Pakistan’s moment
Updated 20 Jun, 2026

Pakistan’s moment

Pakistan’s diplomats are second to none, and if these states seek to engage this country constructively, a new modus vivendi for the subcontinent can be reached.
Menacing water plans
20 Jun, 2026

Menacing water plans

IN April last year, India suspended the decades-old Indus Waters Treaty, which contains no provision allowing it to...
World Refugee Day
20 Jun, 2026

World Refugee Day

WORLD Refugee Day, observed today around the globe, marks 75 years since the adoption of the 1951 convention ...
Digital deal
19 Jun, 2026

Digital deal

THINGS have moved rapidly where the Iran-US memorandum of understanding is concerned. While the physical document ...
Failing the public
19 Jun, 2026

Failing the public

WHETHER it is Sindh’s struggle to secure clean drinking water or Balochistan’s difficulty in improving the...
Crushed lives
19 Jun, 2026

Crushed lives

COURTS and commissions have often been up in arms over the health and ecological hazards associated with...