DUBAI: South Africa were docked five penalty runs for ball-tampering on the third day of the second Test against Pakistan in Dubai on Friday.

Television replays showed South African fielder Faf du Plessis rubbing the ball on his trousers which had a zip on them, in an apparent attempt to tamper with the ball.

Umpires Rod Tucker of Australia and England's Ian Gould called South African captain Graeme Smith, changed the ball and added five runs to Pakistan's score.

Pakistan were struggling at 62 for three with Dale Steyn about to start the 31st over when the umpires took notice of the ball and took the decision.

Under International Cricket Council (ICC) rule 42.1 on tampering, if an umpire spots a change in the condition of the ball but doesn't know who is the culprit, he will issue a first and final warning to the captain and the ball will be changed.

In case the ball is tampered with again, the bowling team will face a five-run penalty and umpires will not only change the ball again but the captain will be held responsible and reported.

But in this case the umpires saw Du Plessis rubbing the ball in an apparent move to tamper with the ball and they called Smith and docked five penalty runs.

An ICC spokesman confirmed the incident.

“As per 42.1 of the ICC playing conditions, the umpires replaced the ball and fined South Africa five penalty runs for ball tampering,” said an ICC spokesman.

“We don't cheat,” says AB de Villiers

Reacting on the incident, AB de Villiers said the Proteas were not cheats.

“Honestly, we're not the team that scratches the ball,” he insisted. “We don't cheat, it's as simple as that. I know Faffy very well, he's the last man to try anything like that.”

De Villiers said du Plessis, South Africa's captain in Twenty20s, was responsible for looking after the condition of the ball and keeping the shine on. “It's not an easy job, I thought he did it very well,” de Villiers said.

The South African wicket keeper batsman said he had no idea how the umpires discovered the ball's condition had changed. “There was no talk about it, no warnings and nothing, it was just out of nowhere,” he said.

Pakistan was at the receiving end during the Oval test in 2006, the last and only time a team was penalised five runs for ball tampering in a test match.

Then Pakistan captain Inzamam-ul-Haq reacted strongly and decided not to continue the test in protest. Australia umpire Darrell Hair reacted by awarding the game to England – the only forfeit in the history of test cricket.

This month, the ICC amended its laws regarding the condition of balls, saying “if a player responsible can be identified” the ball will be changed, a five-run penalty will be awarded, and the player responsible will be reported.

It's expected the umpires will lay a charge against du Plessis to match referee David Boon, and a hearing held late Friday.

Du Plessis faces a range of penalties; a 50 to 100 per cent fine of his match fees, a suspension from one test and two one-day internationals or two Twenty20s, whichever is played first.

More From This Section

I cannot work with players punished for fixing: Latif

“Any players suspected or punished in the past have no business working for the PCB in any capacity.”

Court rejects plea to reinstate Srinivasan as BCCI chief

“We cannot close our eyes after having come to know about allegations,” Justice A.K Patnaik said.

Inzamam declines role as chief selector

According to a LRCA, Inzamam has refused to act as chief selector due to other pressing assignments.

Situation not conducive for me to work in PCB: Rashid

“I was hoping that I may be working independently but circumstances did not look favourable.”


Comments are closed.

Comments (27)

M
October 25, 2013 6:14 pm

Every team tampers with the ball. Some are experts while the others are novices :).

imran
October 25, 2013 7:35 pm

That is just stupid thing to do if you are in really strong position.

saima
October 25, 2013 7:56 pm

1 team with #2 characteristics. I wonder what (kind)penalty these #1 team will get. I literally mean KIND, or may be they will get away with it, since they are the #1. I feel sorry for the Pakistani people, their Eid gift of winning the first test has turned into a nightmare.

God save cricket, as the rest of the sports have already brought disgrace to our country. This sport is last nail in the coffin.

CricketHater
October 25, 2013 8:46 pm

Thank God it was not a Pakistani other wise the penalty would have been like, life time ban or something.

Nadir
October 25, 2013 9:05 pm

Why are the western tabloids so mute on this story? If it were a south asian player this would have been a front page news.

A
October 25, 2013 9:25 pm

Correction: The forfeit has recently been overturned into a draw.

F.R
October 25, 2013 11:29 pm

A game won with cheating is worth nothing.

Masood Hussain
October 25, 2013 11:30 pm

Why there no uproar at Proteas being caught cheating.Had it been any member of Pak team,Hell would have broken amongst the Cricket World..

Youth
October 26, 2013 12:25 am

Shame for a world class team to do such thing especially on a winning track. What action ICC will take is a matter worth waiting

Oz
October 26, 2013 1:12 am

Yes you were not tampering the ball - the world is crazy, only you are right. One word - Moron!

You have been caught, now face the music. The rule should be same for all teams. I assume they will be let off just like England were... despite clear video evidence of using boot spikes for scuffing the ball.

CricketOne
October 26, 2013 1:49 am

Of course Proteas don't cheat, I am with ABCD. But the cameras don't lie either. I have to change my thinking.

km
October 26, 2013 1:49 am

Idiots, they are winning, why cheat

Dr. Salaria, Aamir Ahmad
October 26, 2013 3:52 am

is a fact that every team in the world does ball tampering directly or indirectly, implicitly or explicitly, knowingly or unknowingly and only the few unfortunate, the few untrained, the few overconfident, the few arrogant, the few complacent and the few carefree are caught. Rest either win matches or take bundles of wickets.

TamzaK
October 26, 2013 6:57 am

A 5-run penalty is not enough ... such 'cheating' MUST result in forfeit of the match. Only then will it stop.

This is almost like Wall Street; you 'steal' and get caught. Usually the fine is about the same amount as what you stole. No dis-incentive to NOT steal.

AB
October 26, 2013 7:40 am

AB, please say I don't cheat. Your colleagues have cheated. Don't talk on their behalf. On your own, I am sure you would never cheat.

Zaheer Ahmed
October 26, 2013 8:29 am

Now we know why South Africa has Faf Du Plessis in the team. He had scored 27 runs in the series and had struggled against Pakistani bowlers but he seems to be the winning formulae for Proteas. He should be giving his trouser with zipped pocket for rent to other teams.

Hyder
October 26, 2013 3:45 pm

Sir,

Every thief went caught says he is innocent and Du plessis was caught tampering with the ball.

Remind us of Hansie Cronje scandal which opened a pandora box world wide. Lets hope the remaining pride of cricket is not damaged by foolish acts on the field.

Regards,

Hyder

Karachi Bhai
October 26, 2013 5:02 pm

For long time I was wondering how come this SA team which doesn't look that strong is number One and has not lost a test series for five years. Now we know the answer -how and why. Thanks for the smart camera work.

ABK
October 26, 2013 7:18 pm

Mr Honest AB, Cronje and Gibbs were also not cheaters, ....please also give us a certificate that we also dont cheat, we only bowled 2 intentional no balls...

mohammed
October 26, 2013 9:15 pm

ABD stop claiming we do not cheat after what your team did in Dubai we need no argument, what you do or you do not but this is a fact that your team cheated and you as a v/capt is fully responsible either to say sorry to all cricket playing nation or stop plying with dishonest team if you do not cheat.

CricketOne
October 27, 2013 2:19 am

@km: Regretfully, some idiots don't want to see the camera witness, as it is not a human.

CricketOne
October 27, 2013 2:22 am

@saima: It was very difficult to read without glasses. Couldn't you find a bigger font ?

Syed Ali
October 27, 2013 7:50 am

What kind of a silly statement is that by de Villiers.."we don't cheat"!!! If it wasn't cheating, why was the bowler fined 50% of his fee? It is so unfair & unfortunate that when someone from non-white countries does something...it becomes a BIG issue...and when a white guy does something similar.."they don't cheat". de Villiers shouldn't have opened his big mouth!!!

Syed Ali
October 27, 2013 8:00 am

@AB: Pardon me..but how do you know he would "NEVER" cheat? Isn't he a human being..or perhaps a super man!!!

Syed Ali
October 27, 2013 7:56 am

@Dr. Salaria, Aamir Ahmad: Sorry, doc..but yours is a very generalized statement!!! Would have been better if you had given some concrete examples as to how it is done!!!

Syed Ali
October 27, 2013 8:06 am

@Nadir: Oh, am so horrified at your ignorance!!! Don't you know the third world countries' teams are colored!!!

Syed Ali
October 27, 2013 8:09 am

@M: Sir, are you an expert on tampering..& teach how it could be done? Perhaps you would be in great demand.

Explore: Indian elections 2014
Explore: Indian elections 2014
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
Poll
From The Newspaper
Tweets