VILNIUS: The European Union blamed the Syrian government on Saturday for an Aug 21 chemical weapons attack in Syria but stopped short of explicitly supporting a US-led military response.

The carefully worded message from foreign ministers of 28 EU governments stressed the importance of waiting for a report by UN weapons inspectors, which France's president said could come by the end of the week - before making any decisions.

While the statement allowed France to claim victory in its push to get the EU to hold Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's government responsible for the attack in which more than 1,400 may have been killed, it also made clear the bloc wants the United Nations to play some role in deciding how to respond.

Many EU governments have expressed reservations about using military force to punish Assad, now fighting a 2-1/2-year battle against rebels in which more than 100,000 people have died.

Germany, where one opinion poll last Thursday showed 70 per cent of people are against the United States bombing Syria, and other nations have opposed taking action before UN inspectors can present their findings.

Public debate has intensified in the United States and in Europe during the week since US President Barack Obama said he believed Washington should launch targeted air strikes on Syria to deter Assad, and others, from using chemical weapons but he would ask Congress for the authority to do so.

Obama made that decision after the British parliament voted against Britain taking part in a strike and US opinion polls showed significant opposition to one, suggesting that he would be somewhat isolated if he ordered military action on his own.

US officials hailed the EU statement as showing support for a US-led strike was growing but the EU stance also highlighted the doubts many nations have and the time it may take to convince them, if they can be convinced.

“A clear and strong response is crucial to make clear that such crimes are unacceptable and that there can be no impunity,”

EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton said, reading a statement reflecting the 28 nations' position.

“The EU underscores at the same time the need to move forward with addressing the Syrian crisis through the UN process,” it added, saying the bloc welcomed French President Francois Hollande's surprise decision this week to wait for the report.

Weapons report next week?

Hollande said the report could be made public at the end of next week and he suggested that France might then wish to take matter to the UN Security Council, a step that could further delay any action.

“When the (US) Congress will have voted on Thursday or Friday and when we will have the inspectors' report, likely at the end of the week, a decision will have to be made, including after possibly referring the matter to the United Nations (Security Council),” he said, speaking from the southeastern city of Nice after a meeting with his Lebanese counterpart.

US Secretary of State John Kerry said he would convey the European desire to wait for the UN report to Obama but made clear that the US president was keeping his options open.

“Obviously this will be a point of discussion (and) we will take that decision under advisement, (but) the president has given up no rights of decision,” Kerry told reporters at a news conference with French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius.

After the EU agreement, Germany said it would sign a statement supported by 11 nations at the Group of Twenty summit in St. Petersburg, Russia, on Friday that backed a “strong” response to the alleged use of sarin gas against civilians.

Germany said it did not sign on Friday because it wanted to see an EU consensus on the issue first.

Ashton said the ministers meeting in the Lithuanian capital had agreed that information from a wide variety of sources “seems to indicate strong evidence” of the Syrian government's responsibility.

They EU ministers' statement, however, made no direct mention of military action that has been contemplated by the United States and France.

Kerry's Europe trip, which includes a stop in London, aims to bolster Obama's push to persuade US lawmakers to authorise a limited strike against Syria over the Aug 21 attack.

However, it is not clear when Congress may vote or whether it will give Obama a green light.

Many lawmakers returning to Washington at the end of a summer recess say many constituents believe the United States should not respond militarily.

More From This Section

Drone kills 15 'Qaeda', three civilians in Yemen: security

The strike killed 15 Al Qaeda suspects and three civilians in Yemen's central Baida province.

Libyan premier quits after ‘traitorous attack’

Thani says he will not accept Libyans killing each other over his post, he will step down in two months.

Iraq scrambles to fight polio surge amid conflict

Officials' efforts saw the last polio case reported in 2000, until a 6-month-old boy contracted the virus in March.

Iraq attacks kill 19 as soldiers ambush militants

Attacks in Iraq left 19 people dead on Tuesday while security forces said they killed 25 militants near Baghdad.


Comments are closed.

Comments (2)

Akhter Husain
September 8, 2013 1:23 pm

Killing a million people by bombing is justified because 1400 people were killed by chemical weapons? Is it really a service to humanity?It seems that all the political intellectuals have gone mad and therefore,they need a mental therapy.to bring them back to senses.

syed wasim haider
September 9, 2013 10:20 pm

EU should blame UK for supplying the chemical warfare reagent. This is pity that for sake of money a country like UK did this.

Explore: Indian elections 2014
Explore: Indian elections 2014
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
Poll
From The Newspaper
Tweets