Low Graphics Site
White bar
.: Latest News :. .: News in Pictures :.
Dawn e-paper
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker



Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather


FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Jawed Naqvi Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

October 19, 2007 Friday Shawwal 6, 1428







Consumer court’s verdict suspended



By Our Reporter


LAHORE, Oct 18: Justice Muhammad Muzammal Khan of the Lahore High Court has suspended the operation of the Punjab Consumer Court order awarding damages and compensation to a customer who was allegedly served unhygienic food at a restaurant.

Admitting an appeal filed by the management of Village Restaurant against the decision of the consumer court for hearing, the LHC judge also issued notices to customer Mohsin Ali Malik who had been awarded Rs30,000 as damages, Rs10,000 as litigation costs and Rs1,890 as the food bill.

Petitioner’s counsel Ali Sibtain Fazli contended that the complainant claimed to have suffered from severe indigestion after dining at the restaurant along with two friends. His friends had, however, neither filed any claim for damages before the consumer court nor appeared as witnesses.

He also contested the claim of the complainant about the food quality and submitted that the items served to the customers were not sub-standard.

The counsel also challenged the jurisdiction of the consumer court to hear the complaint about the food quality. He submitted that the court’s jurisdiction was restricted only to the goods and any deviation from standard specifications during manufacturing. The cooked food did not fall in the category, the lawyer contended.

The restaurant manager and the chef had appeared in the consumer court and submitted that the food had been prepared under hygienic conditions and there had been no deviation from the recipe.






Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2007