Low Graphics Site
White bar
.: Latest News :. .: News in Pictures :.
Dawn e-paper
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker



Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather

FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Jawed Naqvi Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

August 22, 2007 Wednesday Sha’aban 8, 1428





PESHAWAR: Re-trial ordered in murder case



Bureau Report


PESHAWAR, Aug 21: The Peshawar High Court on Tuesday set aside capital punishment awarded to a man and remanded his case to the subordinate court for re-trial.

A PHC bench comprising Justice Qaim Jan Khan and Justice Hamid Farooq Durrani observed that the trial court had erred in framing charge against the appellant as it charged him with single murder in a double-murder case. The bench partially accepted the appeal filed by accused Jawed Khan and ordered his re-trial.

The appellant was charged with his two accomplices with firing at a vehicle killing its driver Alamzeb and a policeman, Mohammad Ali, on Jan 24, 2001, at Lachi in Karak district. He was reportedly employed with the Frontier Constabulary.

The prosecution claimed that he, in plain clothes, and the other two accused had tried to stop a car for robbery and fired at it.

The additional district and sessions judge in Karak had sentenced him to death on June 17, 2006, whereas the two other accused have been absconding.

Advocate Ijaz Khan Sabi appeared for the appellant and contended that it was a double-murder case as mentioned in the FIR and post-mortem examination of both the victims had been conducted.

He argued that at the time of framing the charge, the trial court charged the accused with one murder. He argued that it was a mistrial as it was not clear for whose murder the appellant had been convicted.






Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2007