Low Graphics Site
White bar
.: Latest News :. .: News in Pictures :.
Dawn e-paper
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker



Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather

FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Jawed Naqvi Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

August 16, 2007 Thursday Sha’aban 2, 1428





HYDERABAD: Nazim moves court against office occupation



By Our Correspondent


HYDERABAD, Aug 15: The Hyderabad circuit bench of the Sindh High Court on Wednesday issued notices to the secretary of local government, district nazim and the DCO of Matiari and four others on a petition filed by Matiari District Naib Nazim Noor Mohammad Nizamani.

The petitioner, who was represented by Abdul Sattar Kazi advocate, said that a respondent, deputy district officer (DDO) of finance and planning, Muneer Tunio, private secretary to district nazim, Arbab Hajano, and mukhtiarkar of Matiari taluka, Salamat Memon, broke open locks on the district council and sealed his office, which was then handed over to Muneer Tunio.

He said that on July 31 the DCO of Matiari posted the respondent DDO in the council in addition to his official duties, and then another respondent, Yousuf Hajano, called the session on Aug 11 although he was not competent to do so.

He said that the local government department recalled the orders of DCO on Aug 4 and allowed him to continue work but the district government did not act upon it. The petitioner's counsel said that the respondents were trying to harass his client. On Aug 8, one Mohammad Qaim who belonged to opposite party fired on Mr Nizamani’s petrol pump to terrify him, he said.

He prayed the court to declare the letter issued by the council officer as illegal and requested to declare that any decision taken by the impugned session of the council should also be declared illegal.

He said that the respondents should be restrained from acting illegally as they had no power to break open any office of the petitioner and issue requisition for session.

The court fixed the next hearing for Aug 22.






Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2007