NEW YORK, June 11: In its lead editorial on Monday, the New York Times advises the Bush administration not to support the Musharraf government as it would hurt the US efforts to defeat extremists.

The paper urged Washington to “disentangle America, quickly, from the general’s damaging embrace” and support democratic forces in the country.

The hard-hitting editorial disagrees with President Pervez Musharraf’s claim that he was a ‘democratic leader’, arguing that if he had been one, he would not be “so busy threatening independent news outlets, arresting hundreds of opposition politicians and berating parliamentary leaders and ministers from his own party for insufficient loyalty to his arbitrary and widely unpopular policies”.

The paper claimed that nobody took Gen Musharraf’s democratic claims seriously except the Bush administration which considers him “an essential ally in its half-baked campaign to promote democracy throughout the Muslim world”.

The paper argues that Pakistan seems to be rapidly approaching a critical turning point, “with a choice between intensified repression and instability or an orderly transition back to democratic rule.

“Were Washington now to begin distancing itself from the general, it would greatly encourage civic-minded Pakistanis to step up the pressure for free national elections,” the paper adds.

According to NYT, that’s a process the chief justice was trying to make possible when he was fired. And that is what Pakistan’s last two democratically-elected leaders — Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif — are both campaigning for from abroad.

“The United States should be supporting these efforts, not continuing to make excuses for General Musharraf.”

“Pakistan has its share of violent Islamic extremists, military and civilian … But they are clearly in the minority,” the paper says. “The best hope for diluting their political, and geopolitical, influence lies not in heating the pressure cooker of repression, but in promoting the earliest possible democratic elections.”

“Ever since his high-handed dismissal of the country’s independent-minded chief justice in March, the general has been busily digging himself into an ever deeper political hole,” the paper notes.

“Last week, he issued a decree giving himself increased powers to shut down independent television channels, but under mounting pressure he withdrew it over the weekend.

“More than 300 local political leaders in Punjab were arrested in an effort to head off protests against the decree. Still, thousands of lawyers, journalists and political activists gathered to protest the firing, the censorship and the general’s continued rule.”

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

MATTERS have worsened in the stand-off between the Azad Kashmir government and the Joint Awami Action Committee,...
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...