Low Graphics Site
White bar
.: Latest News :. .: News in Pictures :.
Dawn e-paper
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker



Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather

FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
DAWN - the Internet Edition


September 24, 2006 Sunday Sha'aban 30, 1427
Features


Now introducing ‘official terror’?
A hurting week



Now introducing ‘official terror’?


By Nusrat Nasarullah

While one sincerely hopes that Thursday’s peace walk by the Sindh Police brings peace and an inner calm as the holy month of Ramazan begins now, it would be in the fairness of matters to observe that Karachiites have their fingers crossed, are tight lipped, and burdened with more suspense and heightened tension. I do not want to use the word ‘fear’ for their state of mood.

As if the daily toll of cellphones snatched, and cars stolen or taken away at gun point, is a cause for anxiety and an everyday apprehension, there have come such stories that a police escort of a VIP killing an innocent man on Stadium Road; and that a lady doctor having been shot dead in Gulistan-i-Jauhar by ‘suspects’ during a handbag snatching incident. In their own ways, the details of both these incidents are scary, terrifying.

Or take the other incident that took place this week when, near Cheel Kothi, PECHS, police opened fire on two young men on a two-wheeler, late at night, when they did not stop, near a police signal. In that incident, one man died and Dawn report has quoted the TPO concerned as saying that the young man was innocent.

All this mentioned above, reflects the ambience of the Sindh capital, and precisely the degree of insecurity and downright fear that grips citizens when they are out on roads. Even a traffic jam can be a source of crime or a cause of it, and believe me, that for passengers in a rickshaw or a car or any other vehicle where the place is a traffic signal, the risk of criminals striking is high.

I want to bring in here the repeated stories that we all hear, occasionally, of how passengers in a mini-bus or a coach are looted at gunpoint by a couple of young men who would board the vehicle feigning to be fellow travellers. These buses are, at gun point, driven to some deserted place or, at times, even on the scheduled route, during which period the criminals execute their plan within minutes.

One Karachiite, with whom I talked about the issue of Karachi’s street crime, yet another time, linked the rise in street crime to poverty, to the tough economic challenges that the young people are facing. What about the affluent youth who are caught after they commit crime in upper class areas? I asked. He said that this was not the majority, and that these educated rich youth who took to crime were motivated by greed or a rebellion of sorts.

It is the street crime reflected through cellphone or car theft/snatching or such incidents that remain unreported that are growing indicators and mirrors of the economic conditions, and the dreams and desires to get rich quick. Then he said: “Have you seen the varying degrees of resentment and the shades of anger in the eyes of the lower classes when they are dealing with the affluent? The have-nots now believe that the haves made it through dubious, and perhaps downright, dishonest means. There is a class war as well, in addition to the war against terror…”

While it is reassuring to see that the authorities are attaching the highest priorities to ensuring that street crimes are brought under effective control, the public perception on what some of these recent incidents needs to be underlined.

With reference to the killing of an innocent man, a 26 year old Asif, by the escort police of a VIP, the obvious thought that arises relates to the way in which some of such escorts move on the city’s congested roads. I asked a young motorcyclist that how he felt on city roads when he heard of this incident. He smiled sheepishly to say that “I don’t stop when traffic cops stop me…they waste time…!” I thought of the risk such an attitude entails.

Onlookers can only presume that these VIP police escorts switch traffic lanes, and ignore traffic signals, and pressure the ordinary people, as a matter of routine. Either they fight their way through traffic jams and do not want to get trapped like ordinary citizens in the traffic chaos, or they are in some VIP hurry, they create panic on roads. Many citizens would wonder whether the VIPs are themselves aware of what a scene they are creating. Or, are they mindful of the image they are creating for the government?

After all, I would imagine that the government would want to have a fair and just image for itself. Can such policemen, who shoot to death someone coming in the way, do good to the image of the government? But then, don’t we know of instances, reported and otherwise, in this Pakistani society where power people, elitist people, people in office, and authorities, are known to have abused powers simply to push through with routine. We are not talking of corruption here, please note!

Now take the other instance mentioned above in which a young man, Zafar Hameed, was shot dead by police for merely ignoring their signal to stop on Tariq Road in the wee hours of Sunday. Should police shoot to kill someone or shoot to stop a vehicle? This young man was planning to wed after Ramazan. Look at the trauma of the family, and contemplate the brutal use of force. If not fear, what else can this generate?

And not just cops, but criminals too are out to kill to have their way. And once again a citizen lost a life, this time a lady doctor, Dr Shazia, in Gulistan-i-Jauhar, while she was buying fruit from a vendor. Now this sort of incident can take place anywhere in the city. This street scare that Karachi has is widespread. The citizen is vulnerable in Clifton and Defence, and in PECHS and North Nazimabad, in Sadder and even around the Club Road and Dr Ziauddin Ahmed Road, for that matter. And it doesn’t matter whether the areas are congested or lonely or what time of day it is.

Not entirely for understandable reasons, except for nostalgia, I want to refer to a column “The Last Word” that Naushaba Hussain (now Naushaba Burney) wrote in the Outlook on Jan 26, 1963. She wrote about Karachi and described it as “the unloved, beloved city”. She wrote of a city that no more exists, to say the least. The column reminded me of my school days when she said: “Thanks to its lack of tension, perhaps some of Karachi’s worst shortcomings have become its greatest assets.” Indeed we remember Karachi without tension. Remember and become sad, of course.

Let me sign off with what this philosophical Karachiite said on Friday night that “Karachi's great misfortune is that everybody wants to possess this city, but not own it.”

Top



A hurting week


HOW one wishes it was good governance and not the highhandedness of the Punjab government that trickled down to the officials (and their goons) operating at every level. Whether it was the arbitrary and illegal banning of a TV network throughout the province, police excesses — read beatings — against citizens, the beating, again, of a woman doctor by an MPAPA’s men or that of a school headmaster by a henchman protected by the nazim and his bosses, this past week in Lahore should have only brought shame on the rulers. Instead, what we saw was an attitude of ‘water off the duck’s back’ as if nothing embarrassing had happened.

Promises were made to redress grievances caused on account of highhandedness, forced meetings were arranged to bring the aggressors and the victims face to face and pictures with patently fake smiles were pompously released to the press to make you believe that all was forgiven and forgotten. Forget decency, there is no pretension of adhering to the rule of law among officialdom. Isn’t this how the late Bugti ran his fiefdom in his Dera area? Punjab today is no different. Talking of Bugti, he did have a freehand all those years until he fell out of favour with the military.

The sitting administration also reminds one of the glorious days of the late Z A Bhutto in power; everything good had to be attributed to him, and the ills to his opponents. But let the comparison stop right there, for Bhutto’s, after all, was a popularly elected government. The lesson that should have been learnt but was not is that even when Bhutto was sent packing and later hanged after a mock trial the skies did not come crashing down. There is something in the Punjabi soul that does not let it dwell even on the immediate past; the people move on sooner than you think they would. The heavily mandated and once mighty Sharifs suffered the same fate not too long ago. Their PR minions, flatterers and spin doctors only did what they were best at: they switched sides.

Just where does one begin picking up the pieces and start setting things right? Politicians, whether in or out of power, are an incredulous breed — those found in favour of the civil-military establishment at a given time are more so. They are not answerable before the people who are only supposed to elect them and keep them there. In our case, it is not always the people who fit that role; hence their utter ineffectiveness as the real agents of change. They are treated with contempt by the rulers and kept at bay at all levels, preferably under all conditions.

This is not to say that the politicians gracing the opposition benches are any more responsive to the people’s concerns. They, too, couldn’t care less. Unless, of course, it comes to publicise over the airwaves whatever rubbish goes into the making of their politics at a given point in time. Most just do not know where and when to stop. The insatiable appetite for attention seems contagious and in that alone they truly are the shadow of their ruling counterparts.

The cross dresser hosting a popular talk show on a cable channel epitomises in more than one ways the working of our political culture: you’ll never get what you see. Name a politician, with the exception of one generally very angry gentleman, who wouldn’t die to be on his show, not only to air his views but also to flirt with the host — often in utter bad taste. The value judgment applies to both political and non-political views expressed on the show by politicians. For the sake of political correctness, let it be said that one exempts the host from the ambit of this judgment, for everyone should be free to dress as he or she pleases and say what they like. The same rule does not allow to politicians after they get elected; they should be held accountable by the people as their representatives. Therefore, you, as a viewer, have the right to like or dislike what you see and hear; politicianss’ views often fall in the latter category.

* * * * * *


AS the holy month sets in, man-made woes compete furiously with God’s promise of this being the month of blessings. Prices have already skyrocketed in this land of the pure, where purity is all but a slogan of a packaged milk brand. Across the border, the Indian government has announced the slashing of prices of a number of everyday edibles to facilitate Muslims during the festive month. Ironically, here at home the fit of hardcore market economy, and that too of the baniya variety, continues to convulse us all.

The MMA may be very upset, and understandably so, with the Pope, and made its annoyance known with customary anger blurting out of microphones this last Friday, but it could not find it in its scheme of things to condemn the pre-Ramazan price-hike — unfortunately now an annual event. This is what happens when politics is mixed with religion in proportions that even Allama Iqbal would not be too happy with.

While on the subject, here’s another great contradiction. With Ramazan also comes a unique culture of jealously guarded ostentatious behaviour that we Lahoris are rather proud of. The indulgence and the pomp with which some of us throw big Iftar bashes are unmatched. In other cities, many more rich people take to giving; not here. A well-attended Iftar party is all about who you are seen rubbing shoulders with. The mixed gatherings are soirees out of the funky party hangouts at the farmhouses — nothing against the ‘mixed’ part, by the way. In short they are as much Iftar parties as the venues are farmhouses. Even those fasting look ready as ever to take on the world and, well, given the sanctity of the month, just stop at posing for social pages.

The good part is that at least some of us are having fun, true to the Lahori spirit that keeps them going. Well, happy fasting. Or is it feasting? — OBSERVER

Top



Top of Page





Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2006