Enrichment not for bargain, says Iran

Published February 28, 2005

TEHRAN, Feb 27: Iran's capacity to enrich uranium is "not negotiable", a top national security official said on Sunday in a fresh rejection of European efforts to persuade Tehran to give up its sensitive nuclear technology.

"There is a belief among the European negotiators that if they give Iran political, security and economic incentives, Iran will give up enrichment," nuclear negotiator and top cleric Hassan Rowhani told state media.

"So during this trip we made it quite clear that enrichment is not negotiable," added Rowhani, who was speaking upon his return to Tehran from a visit to Paris and Berlin.

Britain, France and Germany have been trying to persuade Tehran to permanently abandon its capacity to produce enriched uranium - which can be directed to both civil and military uses - in return for a package of incentives.

The diplomatic effort is aimed at securing "objective guarantees" that Iran will not produce nuclear weapons. Following talks in Paris last year, Iran pledged to suspend its fuel cycle work while the negotiations are in progress, but has also consistently warned that the freeze on enrichment is only temporary.

"Based on the Paris agreement, we are trying to give objective guarantees so that we could resume enrichment and keep up trust building," said Rowhani, still at odds with the European position.

He added that the end of the current Iranian year on March 20 "is the end of three months of negotiations, and will be good time to evaluate if we should continue the negotiations or not."

Iran maintains that enrichment for peaceful purposes is permitted under the nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT), and insists it only wants to enrich uranium to levels required to fuel a nuclear power station.

The United States in particular accuses Iran of using the atomic energy drive as a cover for weapons development, while many European diplomats see the fuel cycle drive as Iran seeking a "strategic option" to build an atomic bomb.

Iran's foreign ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi also moved to clear up an apparently contradictory positions over the possible presence of the United States in the negotiations, after Rowhani said he would welcome US "help".

"We welcome US help, but that does not mean a US presence. One way they can help is by not entering the negotiations. There is no need for a US presence in the negotiations," Asefi told reporters. "There is no contradiction." -AFP

Opinion

Respite needed

Respite needed

All one can fear is a familiar accounting exercise that aims to extract a few more rupees from a narrow, weary economic base.

Editorial

Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...
JAAC ban
Updated 07 Jun, 2026

JAAC ban

Though the JAAC’s demands are open to scrutiny, banning any political organisation — as long as it remains committed to peaceful activism — is undemocratic.
GB election
Updated 07 Jun, 2026

GB election

It is important that whichever party ultimately forms the government puts the needs of the people of GB above everything else.
ODI win
07 Jun, 2026

ODI win

AT last, the Pakistan cricket team had something to celebrate: a One-day International series victory against...